Comments on: WeAreChange confronts Christie Todd Whitman

By: Wayne Fontana

Wayne Fontana — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:17:17 +0000

Her children would have been well away from any fallout and they were probably never allowed near the financial district of New York ever again.

She’s a lying bitch.

Make another bed up in the pen.,.

By: Tod G.

Tod G. — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:21:52 +0000

Found the quote:

“Pat Arcese, now dying of cancer, says government lied about the safety of workers at Ground Zero. He is now suing New York but officials have denied liability,….The three facts, in Arcese’s own words, that proved to him the government lied were: “One, they had these little test tube bottles all around the WTC and they would use these as proof to the workers it was safe. Every day one of the EPA workers would tell us they checked the tubes and it was safe. I knew they were lying. “One day I went around and filled at least 30 of the tubes with asbestos that I found lying around the site. When EPA announced next morning and said it was safe, I caught them lying red-handed and called the official a liar right to his face.”

By: ghost

ghost — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:11:42 +0000

It seems she has excellent responses to the ONLY question these people asked. The wearechange guys got owned this time and it really makes them look really bad.

The best question was the one about whether she would support another investigation. Her answer was horrible and guilty sounding. Annyway, they do need to figure out more ways to look at this particular issue and they need to ask about more specific anomalies rather than the general ‘lied about air quality’, because clearly she could get around that easily.

By: jmejrup

jmejrup — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:28:09 +0000

She certainly won that debate…

By: pb

pb — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:27:18 +0000

I’m curious as to how accountable the “regular” folks would be for making such a statement and finding it to be completely false. I’m really starting to wonder what has happened to the men of this country. If this affected one of my own, I’d take care of it the old fashioned way. The court system is completely corrupt. The legislative branch (with its 9% approval rating) is worthless.

We’ve tried the voting box. Restoration of this Republic will require the extreme sacrifices made by those who initially gave us this Republic. Not a topic most wish to broach but my guess is it wasn’t a popular topic 236 years ago either.

You have to decide whether you’re comfortable living on your knees or you’d rather die on your feet. Once you’ve made that choice, the next steps become obvious.

By: HiFly

HiFly — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:14:03 +0000

Confront and hold accountable. She is a criminal for the destruction she blatantly gave the permission to occur as she had many chances to admit she was a liar just like the rest of the leaders saying the air is just fine to breathe…

By: Pete from Missouri

Pete from Missouri — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:36:43 +0000

Christine Todd Whitman is an abortionistic, gun grabbing power
c*nt. What she did was simply her nature, just like the joke about the scorpion and the frog and/or why a dog licks his ‘nads.

Pete

By: Tod G

Tod G — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:22:41 +0000

I need to refind the article where a cleanup worker suspected the daily tests of toxicity were fake, so he slipped some toxic swill into the test samples when they weren’t watching. The results came back “clean” from those tests, proving they were lying. Anyone got a link to this?

By: Brian

Brian — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:00:23 +0000

You can armchair quarterback all day, what you don’t know is that this confrontation was completely spontaneous, no one was actually prepared, and most of us had not even heard the prior calls. We did not know about this in advance and were notified on the fly. That does happen, you know. Sometimes truth-squad opportunities present themselves out of nowhere. You just have to try your best, that’s what counts.

By: Rick

Rick — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:39:48 +0000

Now that’s going to do alot more harm than good. I think Whitman answered the question regarding her statement on the 18th of September pretty well. She said that there were two seperate messages on that day, one that the air was safe in the lower Manhatten area, and one that anyone working on the rubble pile should be using a resperator. So, to continually ask her the same question instead of trying to combat her answer shows a lack of critical thinking, and frankly, comes off as rude and quite nutty.

If we ever get a chance to confront her again, I think it would be prudent to focus on the manipulation of the EPA report by the White House. Did she agree with the changes? Let her explain that!

Also, the fact that EPA reports had to be cleared by the NSC is a pretty change in procedure, I am sure. I would like to know why that procedure was changed. But, to have the same question asked so many times that it becomes ludicrous, is hurting, not helping the cause.