Your Blog is a Weapon? House Bill suggests Hurting Feelings illegal

Journal-Post
Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Law prof Eugene Volokh blogs about a U.S. House of Representatives bill proposed by Rep. Linda T. Sanchez and 14 others that could make it a federal felony to use your blog, social media like MySpace and Facebook, or any other web media “To Cause Substantial Emotional Distress Through “Severe, Repeated, and Hostile” Speech.” Oh lordy, there goes 4chan.

Here’s the relevant text:
Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both….

["Communication"] means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; …

["Electronic means"] means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.

Sources: BoingBoing.net, Volokh.com

Here’s the bill in its full context.

——————————————————————-

Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act (Introduced in House)
HR 1966 IH

111th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. R. 1966
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 2, 2009

Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California (for herself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARE, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COURTNEY, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Four out of five of United States children aged 2 to 17 live in a home where either they or their parents access the Internet.
(2) Youth who create Internet content and use social networking sites are more likely to be targets of cyberbullying.
(3) Electronic communications provide anonymity to the perpetrator and the potential for widespread public distribution, potentially making them severely dangerous and cruel to youth.
(4) Online victimizations are associated with emotional distress and other psychological problems, including depression.
(5) Cyberbullying can cause psychological harm, including depression; negatively impact academic performance, safety, and the well-being of children in school; force children to change schools; and in some cases lead to extreme violent behavior, including murder and suicide.
(6) Sixty percent of mental health professionals who responded to the Survey of Internet Mental Health Issues report having treated at least one patient with a problematic Internet experience in the previous five years; 54 percent of these clients were 18 years of age or younger.

SEC. 3. CYBERBULLYING.

(a) In General- Chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Sec. 881. Cyberbullying

(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(b) As used in this section–
(1) the term ‘communication’ means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; and
(2) the term `electronic means’ means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.’.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
881. Cyberbullying.’.

Full story here.

Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Fall Of The Republic Right Now Online - Don't Miss Out! Get Your Subscription Today!

CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are "they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU be the next victim? Learn the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY

Comment Terms Of Use

146 Responses to “Your Blog is a Weapon? House Bill suggests Hurting Feelings illegal”

Sui Juris Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 10:44 am
Another statute that is DE FACTO.

Notice how all of their names are full capital letters. These are ‘fictions’ making ‘code’ that does not apply to a man standing on dry land.

J Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:19 pm
ANother vaguely worded law that will get abused (but in principal makes sense to those of us who have been victims of cyber harassment).

Sui Juris Reply:
May 9th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
This is ABSOLUTELY not a law! It is a code from a statute that falls underneath an Act.

There is a reason it’s not a Law.

TheGhost Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
Dear: Alex Jones

I am a research scientist in the field of hydrogen technology. A close friend of mine and a fellow scientist introduced me to your radio program. I have been listening to your program for the past year now. I have come to believe you are for the people of this wonderful country of ours, for that reason I would like to tell you my story. I am Blackfoot Sioux Indian from the Browning Res. in Montana. As a child I grew up in a house full of truck drivers my father, my mother, and both my brothers all drive truck. I watched my entire family work themselves to death in a semi. They worked hundreds of hours a week trying just to make ends meet paying for fuel in my father’s business.

In 1990 I was given the Cattell III (A+B) MENSA exam and scored in the top 1% of the populace. My parents were approached by the Department of Defense and my father thought it best if he signed me over to the Federal Government for further studies. I was seventeen at the time when my parents signed me over to be part of project named “Calypso” a government advanced study program at the US School of The America’s Ft. Benning, GA. I was placed with hundreds of other children from many different countries around the world. The testing that was preformed was mostly to find out how our minds functioned and if we could understand advanced technology just by looking at it. I had a special gift in Molecular Physics and could understand the most advanced complex structures used in molecular manipulation and fusion.

Many of us were weeded out of the group and put into smaller study groups and given tasks to perform. In Feb. 1991 I and four others were sworn in at the US Army School of Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. I was placed in a study group at the Chemical/Bio-Weapons, Scientific Studies, and Research & Development Center there. During this time we were given hand drawn blue prints and documents dating from 1766 from English Physicist and Chemist Henry Cavendish along with blue prints and documents from Nikola Tesla, Don Dingle, Stan Myers, Paul Pantone, and many others. Our team was asked to review these documents and see if any of their theories that existed could be used to design a viable system for military use. Over the course of several years my team designed and retrofitted an on-demand hydrogen production system for use in many pieces of military equipment still in use today.

Later that year I was secretly speaking with Eugene Mallove about some of the systems that we were working on. He was very interested in the processes that our group was developing. At that time he told me about the suppression of technology that was going on. I got very concerned that maybe the technology that I was working on could be used against the ones that I love. I started an information campaign within the groups and was building a team to help get the information out to the public.

The first of my team to be killed was a brilliant engineer in KY 2002. While riding his Harley there another bike with two assailants drove by at high speed and hit him in the head with a club killing him instantly. It would be said that it was from a rival biker gang who mistakenly killed Jamie thinking he was someone else. Two months after this incident I was approached by a black car while running on base at Ft. Campbell, KY they followed me during my entire run and I kept looking back with the thought they were from CID.

On that day my wife and my young son would be picked up at our house in Clarksville, TN and taken to the airport on base and sent back to Malaysia. I filed several petitions trying to get them back and to find out where they were sent to. They had no records or information and no records of them being registered on or off base. The Government revoked my passport and has made me a prisoner in my own country making it impossible to travel. They also made it impossible for me to find work by eliminating all official documents of my being in the service or having a Doctorial Degree in Molecular Physics, outside of going back to them. They made my entire past and I being a real person disappear including SS, DL, and supporting documents of my past experiences. This spooked me as you can imagine and I laid low for awhile hoping to get them back.

I went AWOL in June 2003 after I had exhausted all avenues to get my family back. I was visited in Dec. 2003 in Wisconsin where I felt I was safely hidden from the DOD. I was wrong to think that they would not be able to find me because of my military training and background. They kindly asked me to return to duty or be faced with UCMJ charges. I was told if I played by their rules they would reinstate me and my family could come home. I followed their orders in hopes this would get my life and family back. I would teach Bio-Weapons Defense to DHS through the course of the next year at a MS training center. They still had not returned my family to me and I had spent several months serving their cause. While teaching there in March 2004 I learned of Eugene being murdered in his parent’s rental property. This triggered the thought that I would be next in line.

I finished the course that day with SR and got in my pickup truck and drove away from there not looking back. I got rid of all my credit cards and anything that could be traced back to me. I was trying to get back home to Montana. While I was laid over in a hotel in Sioux Falls, SD, I went next door to a bar that was across the street a band was playing. I drank some and watched the band till the end.

At 1:30am I walked out of the bar and a pickup truck with five guys pulled up next to me tossed a bag over my head throwing me into the bed of the truck. The entire time they hit me with clubs. I don’t know how long it lasted, but when they stopped they drug me out of the truck. I still had the bag over my head one of them shot me in the left side. I heard one of them say that f–ker has got to be dead. They got back into their truck and drove off.
I laid there praying they would not return. I think at that point I passed out for awhile. When I woke up I managed to get the bag off my head I crawled towards a light I could see in the distance. I had managed to crawl to a farm house and banged on the door. When he opened the door to see me laid out on his stoop, he helped me to my feet and he said I was the bloodiest thing he had ever seen in all his years. He wanted to call the police but I begged that he did not in fear they would come back and finish the job. I talked him into taking me to the hotel where I got cleaned up I was still bleeding pretty bad at the time. He told me not to worry and that he would help.

He called a vet friend of his who was another older fellow I could tell they had been friends for a very long time. He said I am not going to ask you any questions, but I need to get you fixed up. They patched me up enough to get me to his clinic where he removed the bullet from my side.

I was starting to wake up from the incident when I got to thinking to myself. How did they know where I was? I asked the man if he had an ultrasound machine and he affirmed that he had. I asked him to look at different places on my body where to my surprise he found two small glass cylinders one imbedded in the back of my skull just under the skin on the left side of my head and the other in between the radius and ulna in my right arm. To this day, I do not know how either one of them got there. He gladly removed them both and destroyed them on the spot. I told the men it would probably be best if they not speak about me or this night to anyone. I left the clinic and got in my truck and drove off. I did not go back home I was afraid that they would somehow find out I was still alive and hurt my family to find me.

I drove until I had no gas left in the truck I was out of money and out of time. The town I stopped in had a carnival playing I walked to the carnival and thought this would be the best place to hide out. I went to work for a show that was at the carnival. They did not ask me for any documents nor did they care if I had any. The owner of show would ask questions about my background all the time saying “I was much too smart to be working for a carnival.”

While at the Alameda County Fair in CA. I ran into a salesman who could not find a booth. I had a booth already and he asked if I would share the space with him. I told him I would. While he ran the booth I worked in my trailer on the designs for a hydrogen unit. I had never given up hope that this technology would get out to the people someday.
I was watching the booth and the salesmen started asking me questions about what I was working on. I decided to share with him the technology and a bit of my life story he was very interested. He said he wanted to help me find the right people to get it out to the public. I did not know at the time that he was Mormon and part of a large Mormon community he introduced me to several men I have grown to trust with my life. In the meantime I have been developing a hydrogen on-demand system for the public.

Alex I am here to tell you I have done it! With the help of some fine people I have finished my revolutionary hydrogen fuel and emissions system. This system can be used in both gas and diesel vehicles, but I have run into a snag. The federal government is back at it again. They have been spreading a fear campaign to stop this technology from getting out. I feel it is my duty to make sure this technology is not shelved or lost forever.

I am surrounded by people at all times from our group for safety reasons. What they have been doing is late night drive by’s and firing guns off near the property I am at. Twice now our group has been shot at while out fishing at a nearby lake. Recently they have been parking themselves next to the research center where we are doing the work at. They have also been taping our cell phones and videoing our comings and goings. They even went as far as going to our lead machinist home while he was at the shop, waking his wife up while she was sleeping, and flashing a badge that she could not read. They proceeded to search around the outside of their property. We suspected they may have tried to plant something they could use for a raid of the facility.

I am afraid that once again I have put my friends and family in the crossfire. This technology could make it possible for people to have their own power source for their cars, trucks, homes, and for this crisis that is quickly coming to a head. I cannot let that happen again.

I am asking you Alex to do a story about this technology. Cover it in one of your video interviews before it is too late and the technology is lost. I will put myself in harm’s way to do a live interview about this technology let you see for yourself the technology in action. People are going to be desperate for energy and this is their answer. This is not about making money hell I will cut you in on sales of the product which you could use to make more movies. I am not in this for the money I am in this to help save mankind and you can ask anyone who knows me if that is not 100% the truth. I would give up all of the money of this technology just to know I helped save a life, even if that life is not my own. I ask you Alex man to man patriot to patriot. You could turn this thing into a huge helping hand for the people. You have the power to make a change for all the people of this once bright country of ours. All you have to do is help bring them into the light of this clean renewable technology.

Please contact me.

TheGhost

P.S. I am sure this not going to sit well with the people in power. This is a last ditch effort on my part as I have sent this letter to your e-mail address several times. I have never received a reply. I hope and pray that by placing this information on your website that you will find it in your heart to reach out to find the truth. Thank You and God bless you for all your efforts.

Annie Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Wow, you are a hero! I hope somenone, anyone will hear you because we NEED YOUR TECHNOLOGY!

TheGhost Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
Thank you Annie I appreciate your kind words. My only hope is I will find away to reach someone in Mr. Jones group. My belief is if Mr. Jones was to see this technology in person he would be amazed by how it works. In turn he would let the people know that this technology is available right now not twenty-five years down the road like Lawrence Livermore Labs is claiming. Currently we are dealing with the EPA and CARB and running into obstacles every step of the way to include a $750,000.00 third party review by one of their certified labs. The process takes a minimum of one year and they can levy more testing and more testing. This is to assure that this technology never sees the light of day and to keep it secret from the public at large. According to the EPA an exemption order giving us distribution rights would only allow us to make it available in a few states, but if we were to receive CARB California Air Resources Board E.O. it would be legal to sell across the entire US. The EPA is federal yet CARB supersedes them which means you are subject to get CARB approval of this technology. They build hurdles that only a large multinational company could afford to cover. We have documents to show how we have eliminated all toxic levels of emissions from even the dirtiest curd fuel you can buy. This technology could create thousands of jobs in this country and bring back manufacturing which we are in desperate need of. The US government is forcing our hand to turn this technology over to a foreign investment group do to its constant creation of more and more problems for us. American Investors are turned away by the high cost of testing and the length of time they have to approve your product. One company has tried to accomplish this, but after five years of testing and millions of dollars later they have been pushed to bankruptcy leaving their technology shelved. This is their motive and it seems to be working. My approach has been to try and educate the public in how this technology works. That is my hope from getting through to Mr. Jones. Thanks again for your comments.

Respectfully

TheGhost

ToTheGhost Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
figure this out and contact me

ewua(F5)(F9) 6qy99 d9j

Norman Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
TheGhost, one of the most interesting posts I have read.

Does your hydrogen system break the bond of a water molecule at lower energy than you get back when you rebond? Or are you talking about fusion of the Cold Fusion type only having evolved the system far enough to be useable?

Too bad the Government won’t allow this technology to progress. If it is fusion based I can see the concern (mini fusion bombs!!) I have read where one lab working on Cold Fusion blew up, the potential is too great to allow this technology in a world of fanatic people.

Can you tell some of the basics of the system in a post in case you do not get an interiview? I have read many intelligent posts and I am sure if you reach a threshold of information the Government may leave you alone as it would then no longer be possible to suppress.

Take care and stay safe!!!

TheGhost Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 9:37 pm
Dear: Norman

That was a very good observation that you made, speaking of the cold fusion link that is. Yes but not in the way that you may think of cold fusion referring to of course Fleischmann and Pons method. I took a completely different approach to the matter at hand. This of course is the utilization of latent energy between the electron and the nucleus of a hydrogen atom in heavy water. To understand what I am about to tell you, first you must understand the energy that exist in the space between the electron and the nucleus of the atom. In a hydrogen atom the energy is equivalent to ten to the ninety-four grams of energy that is e=mc2 energy or you can use this as a comparison method. If we assume that the universe is flat then it would be equivalent to ten to the minus twenty three cubic centimeters of latent energy. That would be the energy that exists in all of the mass of all of the stars out to twenty billion light years. But I believe the use of Einstein’s theory does not work in this aspect. You see when you are talking about things at the subatomic level it is better to use e=hz . Using this method you can see the physical changes that you are applying to the hydrogen atom. You must understand that everything that is physical and everything you assume to be physical is not and is vibrating at very high rate of speed the majority of that being void space. Changing these vibrations at the subatomic level and understanding the resonance of these quarks in the center of the nucleus. You can start to see the big picture. The question to ask is, in a base water molecule what is holding the molecule together? It is believed that the covalent bond of electrons surrounding the oxygen atom is holding the two hydrogen atoms in their respective position. Well that is the simple way of explaining the properties of the molecule. But what if, what was really holding the molecule together was the very high speed movement of the quarks creating void space (dark energy) between the covalent bond and the atoms held by that bond. This dark energy then could be manipulated through resonance there by releasing the bond from its current state. Very little energy is needed to create the resonating frequency in a specially designed containment field. Once you start the process you create nine-hundred times its mass in hydrogen production with no thermodynamic build up. This is the process we use to create the hydrogen production needed for energy production. It simply comes down to a matter of sizing the device at that point. I hope I have answered your question for you. Please understand that this is the simplest way for me to explain the process. I assure you that the process is much more complicated and will take several more steps and much more research to achieve true unity.

Respectfully

TheGhost

GWBUSHPIG Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 11:01 am
Unfortunately the government has suppressed and or killed many inventors and their alternate fuels and alternate energy solutions.

In this day and age we should be driving in water fuelled cars, or cars that run on compressed air.We could have clean efficient and free geothermal power,but then the elite wouldn t be able to enslave us with oil.

Its a shame Ghost but I hope that Alex helps you out here.Good luck with it.

STARMAN Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 9:48 pm
DEAR MR. GHOST
EXPLAIN THE SUPER SOLDIER PROGRAN OR ALL
THAT YOU KNOW OR HAVE HEARD ABOUT IT.

TheGhost Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 11:08 pm
Sorry I do not know anything about that program. The military compartmentalizes all of their projects so that the left hand never knows what the right hand is working on. This goes for even when you are working on the same project. You maybe working on the same tasks as someone else but neither of you would be aware of it. The only other project that I learned of was the revised project “Montauk” simply because I worked with some of the scientists that worked on that project to create the energy supply system that was used. However I never was given a chance to see the actual device itself but understand in depth the technology that was being created.

Respectfully

TheGhost

Norman Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 4:33 am
TheGhost, Although your desire is promote the technology to produce hydrogen for burning as a fuel, I can see by the method why they would kill you to stop the release of it. It seems they would like not to kill you (by taking your family and all) but have you continue your work with them. The concept of being able to manipulate this enormous dark energy by generating the proper resonance frequency seems to be highly dangerous. A Marine tought me years ago that everything is a weapon, for instance a normal pencil can be used to poke out and eye and with enough force kill an opponent.

The technology you are involved in can be used for a Great good for humankind, but can also be used in a highly destructive fashion to destroy mankind. I think as long as people become polarized by belief systems (where they are ready and able to destroy a rival belief…you can even see this anger on posts when some post opposing views…out comes the anger, the cursing, the hate) you will never see such high technology released to the General Public.

Thanks for your intelligent reply!
Dan Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 10:56 am
Good bye free speech.

We’re fucked if we can’t even VERBALLY defend ourselves from 12 year old punks on the internet.

red Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:10 pm
12 y/o punks are even worth defending yourself against?

Will Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 8:30 am
We don’t want to OFFEND anyone. This law is really an attacks of the Freedom of Religion. If your religon OFFENDS anyone, then your are a felon. Another reason to buy more ammo.
Rob Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 11:31 am
I won’t pass, because it abridges the first amendment so even if it does pass it is null and void. and any fascist that comes to my door to enforce this will have a bit more to handle than they expected.

Dave Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 11:43 am
They will just block your IP. Hasn’t that happened to you yet?

BRIAN PEPPERS Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 11:44 am
STFU Linda Sanchez you stupid fucking cunt! Ahhhhh had to let that out before the new law takes effect!

Goober Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Rob,
they won’t have to come to your home to enforce it. They know your IP and they will just shut your sorry ?ss down and you won’t be able to use the net anymore.
Rob Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 11:32 am
Damn it I misspelled “It” Should read It won’t pass.
Unimpressed Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:27 pm
Oh, get the hell over yourselves. As much as I like the first amendment, I’m on the side of those making the bill. I’m tired of you dumb motherfuckers hiding behind the constitution whenever you want to emotionally abuse, bully, and humiliate people to the point that you drive them to suicide. That was NOT what the First Amendment was for. The First Amendment was meant to keep Congress from trying to undermind your ability to dissent, it was NOT meant to be an excuse for you nutballs to run free reign and drive people’s spirits to the ground.

Do you know why you all hear reports about people being bullied to the point where they commit suicide or kill other people in order to be left alone? Do you know why you hear reports about people doing absolutely nothing when they see someone else being bullied? Do you know why you hear reports about the victims of emotional abuse/bullying/whatever being punished when they’re finally forced to use violence to put an end to it, and how their bullies unjustly go free?

BECAUSE YOU FUCKHEADS WON’T PASS A BILL LIKE THIS.

This “We can bully you and drive your spirit into the ground coz we has a First Amendment, nahnah” bullshit mentality of yours is what enables bullies to do this to people. Your refusal to at least attempt to legally protect those being emotionally abused and instead allow the First Amendment to be their cushion whenever they destroy other people is what cushions them whenever bullies are called out on their this. It is essentially, Your Fault.

If you seriously think actually doing anything about the fuckheads who are driving innocent people to homicide and suicide with their bullshit is “undermining your First Amendment free speech rights,” then maybe you ought to have a good look at yourself, or at the very least, seek therapy. The last time I checked, emotionally destroying people is *not* free speech, it is *not* expressing yourself, it is *not* dissent(unless it’s a public figure if you want to get technical but even then the paparazzi takes that shit too far imo).

And don’t give me that “Well they’re just gonna use this law to pave the way for future violations of our free speech and use it as an excuse to hurt everybody, nyaaaaaaaaaaah!” bullshit. The PATRIOT ACT has already shown that if the government really did want to take away any of your rights, they’d do it completely and wholeheartedly anyway. Just because some fuckstick is passing a law to FINALLY protect those who are being emotionally abused does NOT mean it’s a vast conspiracy. The world does not revolve around you. Quit expecting innocent people to spend their lives being targets for *your* convenience.

Goober Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
Unimpressed…. QUIT FRIGGIN BULLYING ME!

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
And if I was really trying to bully you, I could follow you around, stalk you, harass you the way people already do, find out your real identity, round up everybody who hates you and harass you endlessly. If I was really enterprising, I’d post fake shit in your name that would make it so that you would end up getting fired, and when employers look your ass up on Google they would never want to hire you. I could post lies, make up shit about you, photoshop a few pics, and depending on the quality of the photoshop nobody would know the difference. If I was really nasty, I could just make you look like a pedophile online, have some soccer mom take the internet shit to your apartment manager and see you inevitably thrown out. The possibilities are endless(and knowing 4chan have probably already happened).

And when you inevitably complain or ask someone to make it stop, by your logic I could just as easily say “FREEDOM OF SPEECH, NAAAAAAH” and continue my hypothetical campaign to take away your life, all because you want to make sure bullies can hide behind the Constitution and crush whoever they please.

Oh, but you didn’t think of that.

Annie Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
oh smart guy, and just what do you do when the cyberbully lives in Israel? tell me that one.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
Contact his ISP in that country and see if the authorities there will make him shut down. If you know your ass from a hole in the ground, getting his IP and finding his ISP won’t be that hard.

Spamming operations in other countries *have* been shut down before. Look it up.

Just throwing that out there.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Yeah Unimpressed, I am feeling intimidated by your attack on the constitution. My feelings are hurt!

See you in court.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Yeah LipMcNip, you pissed me off so I’m going to hunt you down and drive you to suicide, homicide or therapy like the idiots you are trying to defend are doing.

See you in the mental health ward.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Unimpressed, I pissed you off? Good…I encourage you to hunt me down. I revel in a good cat and mouse game. That will be your mistake and my pleasure.

You should know, however, that I have driven my share of people into heart failure, mental instability and therapy and worse.

Bring it on. *evil grin*

See me in the mental health ward? LOL…Hah…see you in “Lippy” hell…LOL!!!

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
***Unimpressed, I pissed you off? Good…I encourage you to hunt me down. I revel in a good cat and mouse game. That will be your mistake and my pleasure.

You should know, however, that I have driven my share of people into heart failure, mental instability and therapy and worse.

Bring it on. *evil grin*

See me in the mental health ward? LOL…Hah…see you in “Lippy” hell…LOL!!!***

How you managed to learn to walk on two legs and bash your head against your desk accurately enough to hit your keyboard is a miracle of modern science.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 12:17 am
Make up your mind and get your story straight. Am I crazy OR are you going to attempt to drive me crazy as you promised in your previous post.

You’ve lost your nerve. Figures.

It is clear from your points, or lack thereof, in you previous posts that you have great difficulty meaning what you say. You’re a fence rider, wishy-washy, yellow, a puss.

I can see why you have this disdain for the constitution. It requires someone with balls to defend it. You, my spineless friend, truly lack the nads to do just that.

You would rather have the government breast feed you, fight your battles, think for you, tell you what is right and what is wrong for the rest of your life.

You don’t have a spontaneously firing brain cell in that hollow chasm between your ears. You wouldn’t know what an original though was if it came up and sh*t in your shoe.

LOL, you just keep on ridin that fence, pardner. It shouldn’t hurt too bad for someone like you who has no balls.

I can guarantee you will be one of the first whiney babies trying this in court.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
***Make up your mind and get your story straight. Am I crazy OR are you going to attempt to drive me crazy as you promised in your previous post.***

You’re an idiot and you either don’t understand what context or sarcasm is or you’re too nearsighted to see it.

If you can’t see that that’s the kind of shit that a *real* aspiring bully would try to do to you, and if you’re seriously self-important enough to think that I would bother to threaten you online, then maybe you really do need therapy.

Deadaim Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
I just really dont get the whole cyber bullying bullshit! Haven’t you people ever heard of blocking someone, or just not associating yourselves. Its called being responsible for your own actions. Too many of you are addicted to drama, but when it gets too hot for you, you need someone else to get you out of it or blame it someone else. Good lord, grow some balls!

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:26 pm
***I just really dont get the whole cyber bullying bullshit! Haven’t you people ever heard of blocking someone, or just not associating yourselves.***

That’s not always possible(not every site has ignore features, for example). Never mind the ramifications of getting the attention of a group like 4chan that can do evil shit to you both online and offline. What the hell are you supposed to be able to do then?

***Its called being responsible for your own actions.***

Heh, no, really? What was your first clue? Maybe you morons should try listening to this guy, be responsible for your own actions and not emotionally abuse and harass people endlessly because you think it’s your god-given right to trample over the masses.

If people would be responsible for themselves, nobody would be participating in the fuckstick behavior this law is trying to ban in the first place. But, we live in a world where you have to draw straws to rent out the only three brain cells left every day, so that doesn’t look like it’s going to happen anytime soon.

***Too many of you are addicted to drama, but when it gets too hot for you, you need someone else to get you out of it or blame it someone else. Good lord, grow some balls!***

Internet drama is awesome. Being able to argue with everybody through blog comments is righteous as hell, too, but apparently there are lines that have to be drawn. Like when you find someone who you know is mentally ill, pretend to be their boyfriend, lead them on and then crush them knowing full well they’re likely to commit suicide. Or when you get everybody on the internet together to bait, hound and harass some idiot on Youtube who did nothing to you, get their personal information and continue doing this in real life, and all of the other shit chronicled in Encyclopedia Dramatica.

Maybe you neanderthals should try growing a pair of balls and find something better to do with your time on this earth than harassing innocent people endlessly. Seriously, you guys need to get a hobby. Do you know how many video games you could be playing?

Jive Mothafacko Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 6:26 am
Dude, you came on this site trying to incite arguments, and then say that people reading and responding are ‘addicted to internet drama?’ TOO FUNNY!

Hey, I hear that there’s a great argument rocking on startrek.com/org over the new Star Trek movie! I’ll bet you can REALLY stir ‘em up there! Just type ‘HAIL PICARD!’

Move along, please…Anyone who succumbs to the taunting of a bully is weak-willed to begin with. Buck up when you read words. They are but that, just words.

WAGON! WAGON!
DEAD BODIES DRAGGIN’!
MCL

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
***Move along, please…***

No, and I won’t have to, as long as bills like the we’re talking about aren’t passed. And as long as you morons are willing to protect bullies who drive people to suicide, homicide, therapy, and otherwise fuck them up with your “FREEDOM OF SPEECH” bullshit, this is what you’ll have to deal with. YOU get to live with the consequences.

It’s a two-way street. You don’t get to have your cake and eat it too.

Annie Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Well when you come up against a hacker saavy person OVER FUCKING SEAS, that you CANNOT BLOCK because they have your ip and a nice keylogger, THEN WHAT DO YOU DO? AND WHO DO YOU CALL? Most of these bullies that bully adults live in other countries, like Israel, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, etc. And short of going completely offline, you cannot get away from them. Even said, I don’t agree with the new proposed bill because I am completely convinced it will not help whom it says it will, like the youth of extreme cases.

If you want to stop bullies, then start in the damn schools! They have always been there. And in real life at workplaces.

If someone can say something or post something about you, that will make you commit suicide or drive you insane; I guess you never learned social interaction in school. This bill is BULLSHIT and it WILL BE ABUSED. When we are being monitored for our thoughts or opinions, then next they will have a nice little black box in your home to make sure you don’t say anything politically incorrect in your home, and next will be a device that reads your mind so you can’t think without reprisal anymore.

Not impressed seems to know an awful lot about how to screw somebodies life up online; and so do I, and I knew it would not be long before this happened. I said it in 2005. Not impressed is probably a good hacker whom knows how to superimpose photos and hide his ip….. He knows alittle too much and he isn’t a youth!

In fact, he probably is on THEIR SIDE, the side of taking all our rights away and sending us all to FEMA camps. What a loser.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:41 pm
***Not impressed seems to know an awful lot about how to screw somebodies life up online; and so do I, and I knew it would not be long before this happened. I said it in 2005. Not impressed is probably a good hacker whom knows how to superimpose photos and hide his ip….. He knows alittle too much and he isn’t a youth!***

Anybody with an IQ higher than their freaking shoe size can figure out how to fuck up somebody’s life. Which is obviously why we are supposed to have a legal system that will protect us from motherfuckers willing to do so in the first place.

***In fact, he probably is on THEIR SIDE, the side of taking all our rights away and sending us all to FEMA camps. What a loser.***

Oh yes, I’m on the side of the evil Saturday morning cartoon villains because I disagree with you. OOGA-BOOGA.
Unimpressed Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:39 pm
Oh, get the hell over yourselves. As much as I like the first amendment, I’m on the side of those making the bill. I’m tired of you dumb motherfuckers hiding behind the constitution whenever you want to emotionally abuse, bully, and humiliate people to the point that you drive them to suicide. That was NOT what the First Amendment was for. The First Amendment was meant to keep Congress from trying to undermine your ability to dissent, it was NOT meant to be an excuse for you nutballs to run free reign and drive people’s spirits to the ground.

Do you know why you all hear reports about people being bullied to the point where they commit suicide or kill other people in order to be left alone? Do you know why you hear reports about people doing absolutely nothing when they see someone else being bullied? Do you know why you hear reports about the victims of emotional abuse/bullying/whatever being punished when they’re finally forced to use violence to put an end to it, and how their bullies unjustly go free?

BECAUSE YOU FUCKHEADS WON’T PASS A BILL LIKE THIS.

This “We can bully you and drive your spirit into the ground coz we has a First Amendment, nahnah” bullshit mentality of yours is what enables bullies to do this to people. Your refusal to at least attempt to legally protect those being emotionally abused and instead allow the First Amendment to be invoked whenever bullies destroy other people is what cushions them whenever bullies are called out on their this. It is essentially, Your Fault.

If you seriously think actually doing anything about the fuckheads who are driving innocent people to homicide and suicide with their bullshit is “undermining your First Amendment free speech rights,” then maybe you ought to have a good look at yourself, or at the very least, seek therapy. The last time I checked, emotionally destroying people is *not* free speech, it is *not* expressing yourself, it is *not* dissent. It is stalking and harassment.

And don’t give me that “Well they’re just gonna use this law to pave the way for future violations of our free speech and use it as an excuse to hurt everybody, nyaaaaaaaaaaah!” bullshit. The PATRIOT ACT has already shown that if the government really *did* want to take away any of your rights, they’d do it completely and wholeheartedly anyway. Just because some fuckstick is passing a law to FINALLY protect those who are being emotionally abused does NOT mean it’s a vast conspiracy. The world does not revolve around you.

The Iron Sheik Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
Try to bully me, Unimpressed. I’ll make you humble the Iranian way.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:36 pm
And then you’ll inevitably go to jail despite the fact that everybody knows you’re in the right because of the legal loophole given to bullies that this bill is trying to fill in.

And when you inevitably get abused by the guards and raped by the other inmates for up to a year or more depending on the statute used as an excuse to imprison you, you’ll start to see how incredibly biased the legal system has been set up against victims of bullying and abuse.
Randy Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Would it hurt your feelings if I asked you how you like that kool-aid? Gotta go, someone’s knocking at the door.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Would it hurt your feelings if I asked you how you like the taste of Alex Jones’s cock?

Heaven forbid you have a mind of your own.
babalo Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Unimpressed, you have a HUGE misunderstanding of what is going on in this world. If you would just get a statistic on exactly how many people have actually committed suicide due to being bullied online (maybe 1 person a year), vs how many of them committed suicide because of a bad upbringing you would understand what people mean (hmm this number sounds pretty huge to me).
This new bill will simply open a new door of laws to try to put people in jail for voicing their opinions. This starts with your blog, the vulgarity you use in your speech could be considered to some as offensive and therefore potentially put you in a position to go to jail for 2 years for voicing your opinion. Hope that clarifies it for you.
In the event that your blog was just sarcasm … good one!

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
I’m not just concerned with the schmucks who commit suicide or kill other people because of this shit. They’re easy to use in example because they’re well-known and out there. There are plenty of others who are forced to go through their lives endlessly being the targets of the people around them because the people who do this think that they’re more important than those whose lives they are destroying. Sorry, but other people do have a right to live without being your little whipping boy.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Oh, shit, before I forget–

***This new bill will simply open a new door of laws to try to put people in jail for voicing their opinions. This starts with your blog, the vulgarity you use in your speech could be considered to some as offensive and therefore potentially put you in a position to go to jail for 2 years for voicing your opinion. Hope that clarifies it for you.***

Just like the PATRIOT ACT, the protection of phone companies when they helped the government spy on your asses and the other 5 billion bills the government passed that allegedly did the same thing. It doesn’t matter, they’re going to do it anyway, so at least ATTEMPT to protect those who actually need it.
Ken Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Unimpressed,

Just wondering why it’s so hard for people to just ignore e-mails or posts from those they don’t want to talk to, or heaven forbid, the person who feels bullied just turns off the computer. Come on, the onus should be on the individual to take responsibility for themselves. We shouldn’t have a huge government regulating our every move.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:20 pm
How in the hell is it so hard for a bully to turn off the computer when they feel the compulsion to destroy everybody he doesn’t like? If you’re not mature enough to get along with the people around you without campaigning against them at your whim and behest, DO NOT GET ON THE INTERNET.

As long as people are going to do that, and as long as fucksticks like you are gonna jump on the bandwagon and defend bullies whenever they’re called out on it, then yes, you’ll have to have a third party regulating what you do.

Stop expecting people to simply bow down and roll over whenever you want to hurt them. How in the hell is that so hard?

dave310 Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Unimpressed, I don’t think most of the people here are defending cyberbullying or cyberterrorizing, especially when it comes to children. (Personally I don’t think kids should have internet in their bedrooms and their parents should always monitor them.)

This is a dangerous law because we don’t know who will be setting the standards. Will they say that questioning 9-11 is causing stress for victim’s families? (They’ve been saying that all along actually.) Or maybe you’ll want to write a blog about some politician you think is a corrupt jackass; then all of the sudden his or her family is upset and the next thing you know you’re getting fined and or thrown in jail.

Reminds me of the people who don’t care if they’re being spyed on because they’re “doing nothing wrong”. Those people should realize that someone else may have a completely different opinion of what’s right and wrong…and it may be that person who’s in charge of monitoring you.

The woman who helped her daughter harass a young girl (who later commited suicide) should be punished for her actions, but we don’t need a bill like this to deal with peope like her.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
***Unimpressed, I don’t think most of the people here are defending cyberbullying or cyberterrorizing, especially when it comes to children. (Personally I don’t think kids should have internet in their bedrooms and their parents should always monitor them.)***

Actually, yes they are, in case you haven’t noticed the 5 billion bozos equating bullying and harassment to their god-given First Amendment right to free speech.

Honestly. You seem like a sane man, tell me what the hell their problem is. How is this shit even remotely constitutional, let alone acceptable?

***This is a dangerous law because we don’t know who will be setting the standards. Will they say that questioning 9-11 is causing stress for victim’s families? (They’ve been saying that all along actually.) Or maybe you’ll want to write a blog about some politician you think is a corrupt jackass; then all of the sudden his or her family is upset and the next thing you know you’re getting fined and or thrown in jail.***

Then write to the congressmen who are passing this law and force them to put in open, specific standards to what bullying consists of if you’re that concerned about it. It won’t be hard to find material; just troll around ED and 4chan for five minutes and you’ll be straight.

What the fuck is so hard about this with you people? How in the hell is hunting down someone you know is mentally ill, impersonating a boyfriend, and crushing them knowing damn well it’s likely they’ll commit suicide not the poster standard for this kind of fuckstick behavior? How is picking out some random innocent schmuck, dragging EVERYBODY from all four corners of the internet to hound and harass them, getting their personal information and doing the same thing to them in real life not a poster standard for bullying? Are you blind? Did you not get enough protein and omega-3 fatty acids when you were little? Did you get brain-damaged in a car accident or something?

Look, I understand where you’re coming from, but you people aren’t trying to shut down a corrupt law, you’re all trying to justify emotionally abusing, humiliating and bullying people endlessly because you think that any attempt to force you dumbasses to leave innocent people alone is inconvenient for you. Grow the fuck up and get a life, people.

***The woman who helped her daughter harass a young girl (who later commited suicide) should be punished for her actions, but we don’t need a bill like this to deal with peope like her.***

You will as long as people continue to act like this, and shit like this will happen Over. And Over. And Over again, to the point where some enterprising psychopathic fucktard will take it upon him/herself to hunt down everybody doing this to him or her and kill them. It will happen, mark my words.
d Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Unimpressed believes that:

1. The government is always right. (LIE)
2. The government cares about the people. (LIE…how about those black guys deliberately infected with syphilis? What about the FDA and FTC letting the food companies advertise their foods as “0 grams trans fat” when their foods “0.01 grams to 0.50 grams trans fat per serving”?)
3. The government doesn’t create crises to justify taking away our freedoms. (LIE, LIE, LIE…look at the 9/11 false flag, the Oklahoma City false flag, the 1993 WTC false flag, Operation Northwoods, the JFK assassination, the MLK assassination, letting Pearl Harbor happen on purpose, the recent talk about how the government can use cyber false-flags to justify a cyber-PATRIOT Act)
mummystate Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Aren’t the existing laws covering things like harrasment , inciting to riot ,libel and defemation of character good enought ? I understand the lady who lost her daughter due to an ADULT cyber bully but I also undertand the need for rationale responses and not after the fact feel good legislation.

And how are they going to differentiate between personal opinion and personal attack meant to intimidate/harm. If I call someone and idiot or a fool doesn’t mean I want them to jump out a window it’s just means that; they are idiots and fools – a personal opinion.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
***Aren’t the existing laws covering things like harrasment , inciting to riot ,libel and defemation of character good enought ?***

No, there are numerous court cases where the police refused to enforce regular stalking and harassment laws and got away with it because the highest court in each case ruled that the police have no obligation to protect you.

Maybe with a law that the police think would benefit them, or with enough soccer moms finally making themselves useful with their screeching banshee bullshit, something like this could come in handy.

***And how are they going to differentiate between personal opinion and personal attack meant to intimidate/harm. If I call someone and idiot or a fool doesn’t mean I want them to jump out a window it’s just means that; they are idiots and fools – a personal opinion.***

I’m pretty sure the whole “hunt down someone who was known to be depressed, pretend to be her boyfriend and then crush her knowing damn well it’s likely she’ll commit suicide” thing is a good indicator of which is which. So is following around one person and harassing them endlessly, so is managing to turn an entire group of people against you like what usually happens in institutions like schools, setting up situations where people in authority think the victim is at fault for something and is punished despite the whole thing being faked, so is the shit that 4chan does, the list goes on.

Honestly, read the stories of schmucks who have committed suicide or have killed others because of what was done to them, describe the antics of the bullies in detail and there you go, easy definition.

Jive Mothafacko Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 6:33 am
Suicide is for pussies anyway. NO PITY SHOULD EVER BE FELT FOR THEM! NONE! They gave up the precious gift of life to ‘SHOW SOMEBODY’ or because ‘NO ONE LOVES THEM.’
Whatever…The only ‘VICTIMS’ in a suicide are those who are left behind to pick up the pieces after a senseless, stupid reaction to a temporary problem.

No legislation will keep the suicidal from meeting their ends. Anyone who would let anything in this world lead them to an early exit is beneath contempt through my eyes. ‘Remember…slit down the wrists and not across…and if you are using a gun, shoot yourself in the heart, that way there’s not much chance of living.’

A bill to protect the potentially suicidal? That’s a farce…

WAGON! WAGON!
DEAD BODIES DRAGGIN’!
MCL

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
***Suicide is for pussies anyway. NO PITY SHOULD EVER BE FELT FOR THEM! NONE! They gave up the precious gift of life to ‘SHOW SOMEBODY’ or because ‘NO ONE LOVES THEM.’
Whatever…The only ‘VICTIMS’ in a suicide are those who are left behind to pick up the pieces after a senseless, stupid reaction to a temporary problem.***

I’m sure someone who listens to a couple of wannabe ghetto rats who rap about the tough and hard life in the suburbs while hiding behind clown makeup would be the expert on being a pussy.

Idiot.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
The current laws were in place during a relatively free society. When people would go in and argue their cases. Now, we have a bumper crop of mindless idiot tyrants and we do not have the time nor capacity to manage an intellectual argument.

We need the equivalent of stereotype legislation where there is no thinking needed.

There is no way they can manage pulling down the free world AND intellectual court arguments AND keeping things free all at the same time.

Tyranny take alot of resources and they can’t be bothered fairness or logic.
GS Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
It also means we can sue the networks and shows like family guy and south park or any of the other “humor at our expense” TV programs.. We could make some serious $$…

This is bullshit, you have the right under the Constitution to speak..

They are tired of people telling illegals they dont belong here..

Sanchez is a laraza funded stooge…
Her politics come from the maldef, lulac etc..
She hates anyone who isnt brown and screams racism because she has no other argument.
All the while denouncing whites and trying to guilt us into handing the USA to mexico..

Its a two way street sanchez-
You racist pig licker-
Cyberbitchbully

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:52 pm
***It also means we can sue the networks and shows like family guy and south park or any of the other “humor at our expense” TV programs.. We could make some serious $$…***

When Family Guy and South Park chooses a random target, stalks them and harasses them endlessly the way the fuckstick bullies in the junior highs, high schools, workplaces and other places do to people, then sure, go ahead and ban them. When they financially trap someone in a place where they are forced to be emotionally abused by the breadwinner, have no ability to leave and will end up being homeless and starving to death if they try, have no one else they can turn to, stay with, or force the bully to stop, then sure, go ahead and ban them. But as long as they continue to do what they’re ACTUALLY doing on their show, irreverent jokes and political commentary, then leave them alone.

Nice apples-to-oranges comparison there moron.

***This is bullshit, you have the right under the Constitution to speak..***

No, the First Amendment was meant to keep Congress from taking away your right to dissent, it is NOT a blast shield for idiots like you to hide behind so you can push around, bully and abuse anybody you want. Get. The fuck. Over it.

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:40 am
unimpressed you are the biggest whinyest sad ball sack loser pussy in America-
Free speech says, Go Fuck Yourself..
so go fuck yourself

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
If having someone call you out piss you off that much, then just pass the fucking bill. If not, then get over yourself and learn to deal with it when someone tells you things you don’t want to hear.

You can dish it out, but taking it’s always the trouble, isn’t it?

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
And it’s always so hard to walk the walk after talking the talk, isn’t it?
GS Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
If you dont like the channel.. change it..
if you dont like people telling you to go f*ck yourself dont be around those people.

How about passing a real law sanchez.. LIKE ENGLISH ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
***if you dont like people telling you to go f*ck yourself dont be around those people.***

HOO-HOOOOOO! The clue train’s rolling in, next stop is you. The people being bullied don’t HAVE a choice but to be subjected to this shit. You are FORCED to go to school or work and be bullied there. You are FORCED to be bullied by police, you are FORCED to be bullied by anyone smart enough to make sure they’re the only financial provider for you and will make you face homelessness if you don’t cooperate.

It’s completely unrealistic of you to place the burden squarely on the victim’s shoulders and expect them to not be able to have any kind of a life at all because you are inconvenienced at the notion that you can’t destroy anybody you want. Think about what you are saying for more than three seconds and grow the fuck up.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
For the internet thing, not to mention that it’s become such a huge part of society now that it’s difficult if not impossible to get quality information without using it, and not to mention that so many businesses use it that, provided you have an office job, you will be forced to use it on a daily basis at your job.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
LOLOL!!! You mean they are going to remedy “we the people” being “FORCED to be bullied by police”?? ROFL!! “Now, your not against that, are you”?

LOL, nice try…they day they put a stop to police bullying is the day I will have my mouth sewn shut.

Cut your propaganda bullshit.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
As opposed to what you are proposing, that in this example they should be allowed to profile, harass and abuse anybody they want to because it’s their “freedom of speech”. By YOU and YOUR own logic, those pigs you hate would be able to do the exact same things you fucktards do nothing but whine, bitch about endlessly, and call them to be banned for. Just what the hell did you think the pigs were doing, handing out tea and crumpets?

Deliberately pull you over and not do that to any of the other drivers? “That’s my freedom of speech!” Deliberately racially profile and harass you? “That’s my freedom of speech!” Abuse their powers to destroy your life? “That’s my freedom of speech!”

You guys don’t do too well in the thinking department.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:06 pm
Nothing was “proposed” in my post. It was me making fun of your stupidity and double-speak.

Get your facts straight. Censor one, censor all. The legislation should be trashed.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 8:21 pm
***Nothing was “proposed” in my post. It was me making fun of your stupidity and double-speak.***

You’re not making fun of shit. You’re “proposing” that innocent people should be your eternal whipping boys because you can’t be assed to learn how to get along with anybody else. And even more insulting, you’re “proposing” that you have an IQ higher than a freaking coconut.

Either get a clue, or get a bullet to put an end to your faggotry forever.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 12:20 am
Resorting to middle school, immature behavior like name calling shows your inability to think in any other way than that of a dog.

Nuff said.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
And that sure hurts coming from one of the brain-dead morons trying to protect that kind of behavior in the first place.

This is what you get to deal with when you scream “FREEDOM OF SPEECH” whenever someone calls you out on your shit. It’s a two-way street. The only way you get to stop it is if you pass laws like the one you’re all trying to shoot down. That’s the ONLY way you get to put an end to it, but you won’t do it because you’re too much of a selfish, short-sighted moron to see past the crack of your own ass.

So don’t start whining to me when YOU get called names.

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:37 am
I guess you have been bullied all your life, never willing to stand up for yourself you stupid pig f*cker-
Too scared?
Too pussy?
Do you just lay around and cry all day?
Words just ball you up into tears?
Gee even your co workers know what a puss you are and they f*ck with you too?
boo hoo
cry me a river..
Grow some balls, more than just typing your all caps on the keyboard UNIMPRESSED-
You are pathetic, loser..
Bully the Bully dumbass..
Dont cry pussy, your formal education is over, now grow up bitch
GS

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Grow some brain cells first. Then we’ll talk.
mummystate Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
The current political administration has an agenda to PUSH through and they will ram it down our throats at all costs. Alot of these seemingly harmless ‘ for the good of ‘ laws must be in place before they progress.

I remember when the RICO statues first came out it was intended for use against organized/mafia now you here it being used against the smallest of drug gangs so a D A can pad their resume.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
Don’t think I don’t understand where you’re coming from. Unfortunately, unless the government is going to legalize violence(which we all know they’re not, violence being such a useful tool to throw out corrupt idiots in power and all), shit like this is going to have to eventually be passed because who the fuck is going to realistically sacrifice their lives because everybody thinks it’s their “right” and their “freedom” to bully and emotionally abuse people endlessly?

You’ve all seem to have forgotten that as much as you have a right to speak, you have a right to live too, and nobody’s going to be able to live while being hounded, bullied, harassed and abused endlessly by other people. Your rights end where another’s begins.

Unless you can come up with a realistic solution that will stop bullies from being able to do this to other people that WON’T place the burden on the victim and expect them to cave to those trying to hurt them, then laws like this will be necessary, for better or worse.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
*******”You’ve all seem to have forgotten that as much as you have a right to speak, you have a right to live too, and nobody’s going to be able to live while being hounded, bullied, harassed and abused endlessly by other people. Your rights end where another’s begins.”

You must be talking about all the invasive red light cameras (and other invasive cameras throughout society), all the tracking and tracing of our personal information, the invasion of our phone calls, email and coming and going.

Yeah, that’s what I thought you were talking about.

You are so full of shit, Unimpressed.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
***Yeah, that’s what I thought you were talking about.***

I don’t think you really know what the hell you’re talking about, let alone what we’re arguing about.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 12:21 am
There you go “thinking” again. Be careful with that, you’re going to hurt yourself. Put a helmet on.

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:42 am
unipressed crying more like a 2 year old in a tantrum..
loser
prospector Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Everything is NOT warm & fuzzy!!!! There are people in this world that will try to bully you, harass you, etc. GROW UP!!!! Sounds like sissies & homosexuals trying to protect other sissies & homosexuals by giving them special rights. Harassment is harassment, assault is assault, etc. There are already laws to protect you. It is a misdemeanor in most states to make harassing phone calls. Might even apply to the web ???? Also against the law to make threats of violence against you.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Oh, don’t pull that strawman shit on me. Of course there are going to be people in the world that will bully you, THAT IS WHAT THIS LAW IS MEANT TO PUT AN END TO. That’s why we HAVE laws in the first place: to protect you against those who would do you harm. Don’t try to insinuate to me that it’s ok for you to bully whoever you want because other people will do the same. Maybe you should apply the same logic to jumping off of a cliff, join the other lemmings and see how well that pans out for you.

People have to be able to live in peace. If you’re so immature that you have to push around, bully, emotionally abuse the people around you and then hide behind the constitution whenever you’re called out on it, then *you* need to grow the fuck up. Just because you’re inconvenienced by the fact that you can’t harass any more people through ED and 4chan does not mean everybody else has to suffer because of YOU.

The world is a 5.9736 × 1024 kg hunk of various elements orbiting around the sun that almost 7 billion people have to share. Get a clue people.

***Harassment is harassment, assault is assault, etc. There are already laws to protect you. It is a misdemeanor in most states to make harassing phone calls. Might even apply to the web ???? Also against the law to make threats of violence against you.***

And those laws can and have only been either ignored completely or used against the victims of bullies who finally snapped after years of abuse. Maybe it’ll take something as specific as this to give you idiots the wake-up call you need.

Macy Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Alright alredy! I get it ! You’ve been bullied. I’m sorry. Geeze Louise, give it a rest.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
I haven’t been. I’m talking about the other schmucks that have no escape from the faggotry everybody here seems to think is OK. I’ve seen it happen to people way too many goddamned times to back down on this.

ATTENTION MORONS ON PRISONPLANET: If you can’t learn to play nice, you won’t get to have nice things anymore. And as long as you vapid shitheads continue to emotionally abuse people and drive them to suicide or homicide, bills like this WILL be necessary. The other 6.999 billion people on the face of this earth have a right to a life too. It is NOT about you.

LipMcNip Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 12:23 am
“faggotry” is his ^ favorite word. It’s the three syllables that has him enamored.

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:47 am
unimpressed says
“And as long as you vapid shitheads continue to emotionally abuse people and drive them to suicide or homicide, bills like this WILL be necessary. ”

He also said to Lip “Either get a clue, or get a bullet to put an end to your faggotry forever.”

The only dipshit loser this bill applies to is the no brain pathetic child known as unimpressed the crybaby who does all he talking.. to no one…

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
***The only dipshit loser this bill applies to is the no brain pathetic child known as unimpressed the crybaby who does all he talking.. to no one…***

Don’t start crying about it. That’s the kind of shit YOU with YOUR own logic wanted to protect, remember?

Not sounding so cool once you’re the one on the frying pan, are you?
magpie Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
this gives me an idea i’m going to take my credit card supplier to court for all those phone calls asking for thier money back i’m so hurt and feel harrast

Annie Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
No shit! And they say anything they want, lie and threaten and harrass, and it must be legal cuz they all do it.
Unimpressed Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
How do you people manage to breathe, let alone feed yourselves?

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:42 am
quit sucking up the free air jackass..
Your posts are growing more pathetic with every keystroke-
Loser

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
Pass that law and you’ll be able to. If you continue to shoot it down and continue to protect the people who bully innocent people, then you’ll have no choice but to deal with people calling you out on your shit.
Rob Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
“To every action there is an EQUAL AND OPPOSIT REACTION”,
Please under line the word opposit and not same reaction.
So there is not much to worry.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:17 pm
Yes there is a lot to worry about; if the victims of bullies ever did try to do anything themselves to force people to stop, they’d be punished, kicked out of whatever institution they were stuck in and thrown in jail because of idiots up above who think that anyone who interrupts their 4chan troll orgies is violating *their* rights.

This happens All. The Time. Victim gets bullied, victim turns to third party who is allowed to have power to get shit stopped, nothing is done about bullies, if victim doesn’t spend his life depressed he’ll finally snap and beat his bully senseless, bully gets rewarded and victim gets thrown out of wherever because “Violence is bad, nyaaaaaah”. Or, on the internet, if said victim has an IQ higher than a rock he’ll just hack his bully, and then said victim will be put in prison and the bully will get off scott-free.

Sorry, but this shit has to stop. This is crazy. Other people are not meant to be targets for your bullshit. If we lived in a world where victims were free to deal with their bullies as they see fit without fear of punishment, this wouldn’t be an issue, and then you’d get the “equal and opposite reaction” you believe would happen under normal, sane circumstances. But this is a society where any kind of power to make any kind of change is only allowed to be in the hands of a third-party who controls everyone else, and so this third party must be forced to deal with the problem. If you brain-dead morons don’t like it, try learning to be halfway civil and try not bullying and emotionally abusing the people around you.

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:48 am
loser crybaby unimpressed.. pathetic child

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Anti-Semitic loser.

Annie Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:51 pm
Equal or GREATER reaction is the true wording. And usually, the reaction is GREATER.
Ken Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Just let “Unimpressed” have his say. Responding to everything tells me this person just lovers to debate to try and anger people. If he wants government intervention into everything he’ll have it soon enough.

If you can’t just ignore someone harassing you online, then something is wrong with you.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
***If you can’t just ignore someone harassing you online, then something is wrong with you.***

If your life is so devoid of substance that you have to harass and bully people either online or offline endlessly, there’s something wrong with you.

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:49 am
You dont have to be on line, you dont have to open mail or read posts, you just turn the channel, just like tv you crybaby loser

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Actually, nowadays, yes you do. Most office jobs(those that pay higher than minimum wage anyway)require the use of computers and the internet.

Annie Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
He loves the laws and the govt so much hell, I bet he’s in line every month for his food stamps too.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
Do you guys have outlets in your brains that let Alex Jones plug into and pump vapid mindless bullshit into your craniums?

Opie Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:14 am
Gee, And I thought I was an Internet Troll, I am VERY IMPRESSED… NOT!!! You are obviously a Jew by some of the colorful language you use, and the only one you have IMPRESSED is YOURSELF… You relish in baiting, it reminds me of when I caught a fish with an extra hook in its mouth and it spoke to me and said… “Sorry, you’ll have to let me go, I’m on another line”… Well, I’m not a fish, and I’m not hooked on your line JEW… Go F^CK YOURSELF MORON, this is not a crowded theater and I’m not yelling fire. So moron, if you lose a debate in high school, should someone go to jail because you ran home and killed yourself out of discrace?… Vapid indeed… BTW, goddamned is two words, shithead is two words… Does “Blathering Idiot” hold any meaning to you? Maybe I should have called myself “Not Surprised”… BTW, I hope you don’t have any sharp instruments in you’re possession after this post!

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
And I suppose someone who uses anti-Semitism instead of making his point would be the expert on “trolling”.

Moron.
Rob Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm
One should use the following tactics in the bolgs :
a) Indirect speach
b) Third person, rather than addressing any specific individual or a target group
c) Be objective, rather than being subjective in all statements.
There must be few more defense mechanism from the rule they impose.
Suggestions solicited!!!
Unimpressed with Unimpressed Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Unimpressed seems like a perpetual victim. One of these people who is always being picked on (allegedly) and can never stand up for themselves.

He probably tried to be cool on some internet site, and instead got mocked. Having his feelings hurt, he now wants all internet freedoms taken away. It’ll give him a small sense of satisfaction when he sniffs into his blanky at night.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
You brain-dead idiots come across as perpetual abusers who have to blame other people for your own wrongdoings and can’t take responsibility for the magnitude of your actions. I’m not really joking there.

GS Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:49 am
wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Unimpressed Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Yeah, you’ll be crying like a bitch when you get fired, thrown out or put in jail when you get bullied by someone to the point where you’re forced to take matters into your own hands, which will only happen if laws like this are not passed.

Keep practicing. You’ll need those tears when your life is taken away from you because society wanted to protect bullies.
Nada Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
I’ve seen this ‘Unimpressed’ on other websites … It’s some kind of NSA created AI Chat-bot. Its pretty cool — but you can ignore it. It’s has no soul, so you shouldn’t be offended.
MiyokoGoto Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
I bet the bill is to shut up the mouthes of the whistleblowers, victims of organized crimes, or things that is not favorable for the government. If the law enforcement cannot take the evidences of crimes, people can use media for the exposure. Now, this freedom is threatened by the government. Isn’t it the way how the reporters can be jailed due to hurting the feeling of criminals? Another issue is what if someone hacked a blog or website and put unfavorable things. You never know what’s in your past blog entries if a hacker added something else. There is no way to check the entire blog for the blogers posing over years. The bill was suggested without much consideration. Is it to protect the CIA agents working at SJSU? I exposed too much and now Dr. English-Lueck might be in trouble for what she had done.

I posted the information of gang stalkers including their use of Neurolinguistic Programming, stalking, death threat, theft attempt, etc. The local enforcement is backing up them and tried to ignore filing the damage. Will the law protect the criminals like these if the bill is a favor for the FBI?
DRILL SARGEANT MCCLINTONLOCK Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU GIRLS IS A BALL WASHING SUCCUBUS DEVOID OF MAN SAC.

I BET YOU WOULDN’T EVEN GIVE A GUY THE COURTESY OF A REACH AROUND.
Jason Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:00 pm
Does this mean if this bill takes affect, we can go after the Federal Government and mainstream media for scaring people through hyping the swing flu or saying hurtful things about alternative media sources/views? I smell lawsuits coming if this passes and will gladly sue mainstream media outlets such as Fox News, CNN, MSNBC or even people like Janet Napolitano for calling me a terrorist because I am a vet. Would love to see some of them labled Felons.
!LISTEN! Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
EVERYONE SHOULD LISTEN TO “THE GHOST”

LETS GET HIM ON THE SHOW
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
stuart Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
I have met people doing great quantaties of meth that have fantasies similar to this. Stop shooting that shit up and the guys trying to kill you will magically go away….
Karla Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
What can we do to fight this? Who can we start writing??? I’m up for a massive letter writing campaign. I think we should write all the new channels and newspapers, although most are owned by the NWO anyway!!
Annie Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Unimpressed is an enemy of free speech and should be tossed out of the country. Freedom of speech is having the freedom to say what other people do not want to hear.

Unimpressed Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
And if you’re willing to toss me out or punish me in some way or form because you think that saying so will show that this bill goes “too far”, then try applying that logic to something halfway worth it, LIKE THE BULLIES DOING THIS SHIT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Annie Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
I’ve been cyberbullied, TO THIS DAY. They make websites, screen names, profiles, sign me up for dating sites, ad infinitum; and I don’t want to kill myself: I want fucking revenge on that fuck that lives in Israel! Does this law go across international waters? Because if it does, I’d love to put his ass in jail.
Patrick Henry Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Canada has passed similar laws, and an entire administrative judicial system has developed to enforce them. The plaintiff files a complaint at no charge, but the defendant can face rather severe sanctions, which, if he or she violates, can lead to criminal charges. Therefore, the defendant must retain counsel if a complaint is filed against him or her. Many times, legal fees to defend against a “hate” speech charge run up into the tens of thousands of dollars. Plaintiffs can refile charges over and over, until the defendant can no longer afford to defend the case, whereupon an injunction will be entered restraining the defendant from uttering certain words, often political in nature, for the remainder of the defendant’s life. Violations are punishable by the criminal law. Plaintiffs are often awarded monetary compensation for their hurt feelings. Many people file complaints all year long, being offended by terms such as “radical Islam,” “the homosexual agenda,” “sin,” “sodomy,” and just about any term that is associated with a minority group, whether inherently offensive or not. The purpose is to chill the free expression of ideas; not whether a person is actually hurt or bullied.

Of course, Canada does not have a First Amendment. America does. It reads, in pertinent part, “Congress shall make no law …abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press… .” The only limit on this right is that one may not yell “fire” (metaphorically) in a crowded theater. In a prior comment someone wrote it is already illegal to threaten someone. That is not true. Assault is threatening someone with the apparent ability to carry out that threat. Free speech is not involved because of the requirement that the actor must have the apparent ability to immediately carry out the threat, putting the victim in perceived, real danger.

The interesting point about bullying in the modern school setting is that schools are so attuned to watching for strong boys bullying weaker boys that a reverse effect has set in. Now, the athletes must stand defenseless while the Goths and druggies spew profanities and spit at them for their Christian beliefs and athletic and academic achievements. Athletic programs in modern high schools and middle schools have rigid academic requirements because participation in athletic programs is one of the only incentives left to schools to get students motivated to perform well in class. The Fellowship of Christian Athletes has moved into many schools to assist athletes in meeting those academic requirements. In short, the bullied in most schools are those most able to take it, and not the type to complain to police about it.

This law under discussion is the result of a few isolated instances, mostly of females, ganging up on another female, with tragic results. It reminds me of the bike helmet law recently passed in a southern state because 8 children in one year had received head injuries that could have been prevented had they been wearing helmets. My guess is that far more children are now injured by parents angered that their child got a ticket for not wearing a helmet, or killed on their way to traffic court, than are saved by the mandatory helmets.

It all comes down to one basic idea, the Bill of Rights prohibits this law, whatever your opinion may be. Period.
madman Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
The pen is mightier than the sword.
The blog is more dangerous than a automatic weapon.

Ironic that in a nation that supposedly has free speech, the Government is afraid of that very freedom.
DIRTY SANCHEZ Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
COME MI CARNE. Did that hurt? You wining sack of swine shit? Go fugg yerself you oversensitive liberal spread the wealth dont hurt feeelings loooooooser……….yeah
DIRTY SANCHEZ Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:13 pm
freedom of speach is far too dangerous to the libs to accept, the truth hurts, so lets outlaw the truth because we can not handle it, loooooosers

freedomofspeechplease Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:39 pm
Shut the fuck up. I’m a liberal and i’ll cyberbully you right now.
DIRTY SANCHEZ Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
sanchez……………..sub human liberal spineless narrow minded puike, did that hurt? GOOD. FUGG OFF!
jollyroger Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
A “dirty Sanchez” for Linda Sanchez.
The first Amendment will not be undermined for a phony reason as this.
This is just another attempt at censorship.
If someone feels that violated, they can simply shut down their computer. Better yet, disconnect it from the internet. Ignore and trash those e-mails. Better yet find someone who can send the bully some nice computer virus.
restricting Americans right to free speech is treaon.

DIRTY SANCHEZ Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
sooo, we go from shutting off the ‘puter to sending a virus to the ‘bully’, you can go fugg yerself too , buddy, pal. You did not even try to bury your SHILLINGTONIAN advice, you shit puke. Yer moma’s proud aint she???????
Brian Wayman Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Rep. Sanchez has attempted this in the past by way of H.R. 6123.
gee Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:19 pm
When are these “politicians” going to start doing their jobs and represent the people that stupidly voted for them? What a waste of taxpayer time and money. The must have contests to see who can come up with the best police state legislation.
freedomofspeechplease Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:34 pm
STICKS AND STONES MAY BREAK MY BONES BUT WORDS WILL NEVER HURT ME.
Sabastian Curry Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
2009=1984
Hellboy Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 7:43 pm
Linda Sanchez is a stupid piece of crap politician. It is time to brush off the guillotines. Did I spell that right?
Hal Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
If this legislation passes military recruiters will suffer, and every act of force will be illegal. The
US government will be shut down.

Mr. Ghost, even if you could get Alex to acknowledge your email and get your product out the world would not be a better place. Population would grow by 10X in 20 years. The Illuminati
will not stand for that. I’m so sorry about how you and your family has been treated. Forget cheap energy, although it is a great short term plan. The US government is all people’s worst
enemy, of course that excludes the Bilderbergers whose power has made quantum leaps in the
last year.

To the vast majority of emails after Mr. Ghost’s: do you have so much free time that you can waste it with online insultagrams? Rhetorical question I guess.
Kelly Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
I wouldn’t worry about any of this except maybe is someone dies on the Supreme Court,because they are going shove this sh’t right back up the legislators ass…Whats weird? is we just got though 8 years of Bush and the left wing bloggers were some of the worst monkey pumpers in the country,so unless they think this will be one sided and only take out Right Wingers,or Alex Jones types..I GOT NEWS FOR THEM!..The day Alex’s site goes down Moveon.org will have to go too…IT WILL BE FREEDOM FOR EVERYBODY OR FOR NOBODY,AND I HAVE FAITH THE COURTS WILL FIX THIS SH’T,ONLY AS LONG AS I CAN COUNT TO 5.
AmericaLies.com Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 9:03 pm
Retards.
STARMAN Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
IF I SAID LINDA SANCHEZ WAS A ASS-HOLE TURD BAG , SCUM SUCKING WITCH

WOULD THAT HURT HER FEELINGS ! ?

FREE SPEECH IS NOT EVIL ….DESTROYNG IT IS

YOU HAVE A NICE DAY LINDA
Prohet Eric Seel Says:
May 6th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
I guess this means Christians will be oppressed with this also. Hmm definately the last days.
By the way the St. Andrews Cross (Confederate Battle Flag) was adopted in 1862. The Stars and Bars was the first commissioned battle flag and looked so much like the Union Flag that they swithced to the St. Andrews Cross. But the very first flag was the Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star. That flag stood for “State Sveriegnty”. Maybe we should all fly that one again? God bless.
Prophet Eric
Jeddy Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 12:06 am
Blogs are a form of freedom of speech. If there was no Internet or any other media – people will talk about how they feel. The French Revolution of 1789 took place without an extensive mass media. The king of France would have banned anything which was written against him, nonetheless the revolution took place the royalty and nobility were eliminated.
No one can stop people from extressing their opinions be they right or wrong. They will harass people offline, of the air of any TV station. Imagine if the Internet existed in the 1950s. would black people allowed to own PCs and express their opinions about racial discrimination in the USA. The blogs would have banned. First of all black people would not be allowed to own PCs, if they owned PCs, they would not be allowed to have an internet connection. The fear would be that some Black person would offend a White one.
The Civil Rights movement did not start, was not the success it turned out to be because people were exchanging blogs, it started because people believed in something and had the courage to TALK about it.
So blogs are half-baked ideas enabling most of the time absolute idiots to write complete rubbish. No blog has the power of getting people together to resolve a problem. You have to have actual contact with people to influenc them, they cannot be influenced through blogs. People with grievances form committees and that means people get together. But a blog is written by some isolated individual who rarely has any kind of social contact – so does not have the ability make people accept their opinions.
Ceedog Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 1:08 am
Quit posting on here and call your congressman, the earlier the better. More posts from Ghost would be nice. Alex could you mention something about this when/if you try to verify the story. There seemed to be some discrepancies in the first Ghost post but his description of the process has got me wondering. I’m not a doc but know you have access to a few.
Robert A. Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 2:56 am
Robert Allison says:
May 7, 2009 at 4:49 am

Rep. Linda Sanchez is Hitler.

I wonder if this will become illegal: Sanchez, you whore, you criminal, back off our 1st
Amendment. Listen you monster, free speech will not be stifled, and we will resort to the 2nd
Amendment if we must to protect our free speech.

You disgusting whore, you make me sick.
truth911 Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 4:38 am
i still say rockafellers are all criminal pigs
truth911 Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 4:40 am
congress are fat worthless rich greedy pigs to
Will Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 8:35 am
This is the last shovel for the media. I am so OFFENDED by CNN and CBS with there bully tatics, always putting down the republicans, and me being a republican. So depressed. There such bullies—lets send all the staff up the road for 2 years.
Dawn Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 10:56 am
Would not be surprised if our government has someone scouring Alex Jones’ website for info to use against him and us. For sure “they” have read the posts by Ghost.
!!ghost!!!! Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 11:21 am
GHOST GHOST GHOST GHOST!!!!!!…..LIKE NIKOLA TESLA…. YOU ARE ONE OF MY HEROES!… DONT GIVE UP… IM WITH YOU LIKE MILLIONS MORE.

GOOD LUCH MY BROTHER!
Unimpressed Says:
May 7th, 2009 at 3:34 pm
Ohh, you whiny shitbags don’t like it when you get a taste of your own medicine, do you? Evidenced by your endless bitching about me insulting you, you don’t like it when someone puts you down, calls you names, invalidates the things you love the most, hassles you endlessly, angers you enough to cause you to waste what little time you have on this green Earth desperately trying to pass on the emotional pain someone on the internet shoved down your throat, and hurts you enough to make you invest days of your life trying to prove you’re right so that you don’t have to admit that you are wrong.

Well, guess what, this is what you’re trying to protect. This is your “freedom of speech”. This is the way you want to live, never being able to make an opinion or have your say without someone shooting you down or telling you off for it. *That* is what you are sowing with your knee-jerk reactions that have no thought to the consequences placed into them at all. And *that* is what you’re going to reap.

I’ve made my point. And while you’re licking your wounds, I hope you all take a good look inside of yourselves, re-evaluate your life, and decide if you want to live that way. And remember, if it’s not someone like me willing to tear you apart, it’ll be some fuckstick willing to do even worse shit later.

Think about it.
Your Blog is a Weapon? House Bill suggests Hurting Feelings illegal « Truth11 Says:
May 8th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
[...] Read more… Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)U.S. CyberBully ActGOP’s ’Keep Terrorists Out of America’ Act Says Thanks, But No Thanks [...]