 |
Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the real power behind an Obama throne
Eric Walberg
Online Journal
Thursday, July 24, 2008
As the United States election race enters the final stretch, Barack Obama as the candidate promising change is revealing his true colours, much to the despair of anyone actually expecting any change.
His recent call to declare Jerusalem the undivided capital of Israel, his denial of Palestinans’ right of return, and his support for a Bantustan Palestinian “state” which poses no threat to Israel show how completely he has caved in to the Zionist establishment on that issue.
As President George W Bush calls for early reductions in combat troops in Iraq, Obama’s position on Iraq — a vow to bring troops home within 16 months, excepting a “residual force” — looks less and less like a defining moment in his foreign policy. Whatever happens to troop levels, there is no explicit talk of overriding the plans for 14 permanent bases.
(Article continues below)
Obama is toeing the line in Afghanistan, too. As NATO casualties continue to mount, surpassing monthly Iraqi casualities as of June this year, he is proposing — now seconded by McCain — that the United States shift up to 15,000 more troops there from Iraq. Just prior to his trip to Afghanistan, he wrote in a New York Times Op Ed, “We need more troops, more helicopters, better intelligence-gathering and more nonmilitary assistance to accomplish the mission there.” Please, will someone show me the silver lining in an Obama victory in November?
But then none of the above should come as any surprise to those familiar with his chief promoter and foreign policy adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who, along with current (and likely future) Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, has already entered history as helping “suck the Soviets into a Vietnamese quagmire.” These are the words of President Jimmy Carter’s Under-Secretary of Defense Walter Slocumbe in March 1979, eight months before the Soviets were successfully “sucked in,” when Gates was CIA chief. The changing of the guard, come November, will change nothing. US foreign policy has a logic which transcends who sleeps in the White House.
What’s especially ghoulish about all this is that there are four Brzezinski offspring who are all onboard the Obama wagon: Mark (director of Russian and Eurasian Affairs at the National Security Council under President Bill Clinton, and one of the prime movers of the 2004 color revolution in Ukraine); Ian (currently the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and NATO affairs and a backer of Kosovan independence, NATO expansion into Ukraine and Georgia and US ABM missiles in Poland); Mika, political commentator on MSNBC whose interview with Michele Obama contributed to the general media Obamamia; and finally Matthew, a friend of Ilyas Akhmadov, “foreign minister” and US envoy of the Chechen opposition.
Brzezinski’s brand of anti-Russian, anti-Muslim geopolitics will dominate a future Obama administration. In Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower, published last year, he lays out his New World Order agenda without so much as a blush. Apparently, there is a global political awakening going on, the goal of which is “dignity.” Not economic development, not the alleviation of poverty, not national sovereignty against the IMF and World Bank. Just plain old dignity, though Zbig’s brand of dignity is the kind attained through secession, Balkanisation, and the creation of weak statelets for each ethnic minority subservient to the US. Think: Kosovo and — if he has his way — Chechenia. Neo-Wilsonian demagogy in the service not of peace but of US world domination, encirclement of Russia and control of the Arab world.
Zbig said in endorsing Obama: “What makes Obama attractive to me is that he understands that we live in a very different world where we have to relate to a variety of cultures and peoples.” Obama’s alleged global approach and trans-ethnic, trans-racial allure are right out of Zbig’s university textbook, or rather Second Chance, which will be the manual for the Obama campaign and presidency.
Obama is literally a second chance for Brzezinski: having destroyed the Soviet Union and shattered the Warsaw Pact, he now wants to dismember the Russian Federation itself and put the finishing touches on Afghanistan as an impregnable US military base against China, Russia . . . the list is endless. Perhaps Zbig is dreaming of restoring Greater Poland circa 1600 — from the Black Sea to the Baltic, all controlled by petty szlachta aristocrats like . . . the Brzezinskis?
The Economist blog put it best: “A new brain for Barack Obama! It’s 78 years old [Ed. note: it’s 80 years old] and it still works perfectly. It belongs to Zbigniew Brzezinski, the peppery ex-national security adviser to Jimmy Carter.”
The messianic idealism of the Obama campaign has not been seen since the days of another Brzezinski creation — Jimmy Carter, who made him national security adviser with disastrous results. Brzezinski’s anti-Russian obsession back in 1976 prompted him to foment the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, which he touted as the greatest single bulwark against Soviet communism. Webster G. Tarpley argues that Brzezinski was even a prime behind-the-scenes mover in the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and installing Ayatollah Khomeini in power in Tehran. Brzezinski cared less about the Middle East and its oil than he did about the need for a centre from which Islamic fundamentalism of the most retrograde type could penetrate the soft southern underbelly of the USSR. For Brzezinski, the space between the southern frontier of the Soviet and the Indian Ocean littoral became an “arc of crisis,” and we have his handiwork to thank for the horrors taking place there to this day.
The 1980 Carter Doctrine — that the US was determined to dominate the Persian Gulf — is at the root of the first Gulf War, of the present Iraq war, and of the possible war on Iran. Brzezinski’s grandiose schemes of world transformation caused a renewal of the Cold War and gave birth to Al-Qaeda, and without Soviet restraint the results could easily have been far more tragic than they turned out to be. By 1980, disillusionment with Carter led to the nightmare of the Reagan regime. But this was of little concern to Brzezinski — a mere blip on his radar screen.
In 2008, we have an obscure Illinois senator, a neophyte with no legislative achievements to speak of, but with a raft of utopian promises, including solving the race problem once and for all. Recession, unemployment and an alarming rise in poverty are of no consequence; a golden age is at hand thanks to his magnetic personality. Since he knows nothing of foreign policy, these matters will be competently managed by the Brzezinski cabal.
But there seems to be one slight hitch. Despite Obama’s slavish pro-Israeli genuflections of late, he is still not trusted by the Jewish lobby. Quite possibly because they know who the power behind the throne-to-be is, and they can’t stomach him, nor he them. Addressing the AIPAC crew in an interview with The Daily Telegraph, he said, “They operate not by arguing but by slandering, vilifying, demonising. They very promptly wheel out anti-Semitism. There is an element of paranoia in this inclination to view any serious attempt at a compromised peace as somehow directed against Israel.”
But then Brzezinski was a key player in Carter’s 1978 Camp David Accords, much loathed by the Zionists as giving up Sinai in exchange for a cold peace with Egypt. Brzezinski is definitely not a hardcore Zionist, though he’s happy to allow the destruction of Palestine. Perhaps he is, under his suave exterior, still the quintessential Polish anti-Semite, with a vision of the New World Order without Israel at the centre.
If he can keep up the momentum, however, he may be able to outflank the Zionists in Washington and bringing his horse first past the finish line. They are on the defensive these days, what with spy trials, even J Street Project, a Jewish lobby group that — gasp — dares to criticise Israel. Is this, then, the silver lining in an Obama victory?
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
15 Responses to “Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the real power behind an Obama throne”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 24th, 2008 at 4:45 am
Psst. Like they don’t all have the same agenda. It’s UNPROFITABLE not to do so.
July 24th, 2008 at 6:26 am
You were told. Are you listening yet?
July 24th, 2008 at 9:05 am
So, our two main presidential candidates will give us the choice of either war on behalf of the zionists, or war not on behalf of the zionists. Tough choices… Do I want war or war? Hmm…
July 24th, 2008 at 9:53 am
“no new tale to tell”
July 24th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Stop paying your taxes and Israel goes the way of the edsel…and so, by-the-way, this totalitarian state we live in. If we get bombed it’s our fault…suck it up, you bomb others they bomb you. What’s wrong with that? You don’t want to be bombed? Well, then stop bombing others you gd morons.
July 24th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
at least the Obama presidency will be short lived
as soon as he listens to Ziggy and bombs Moscow then
we will all be living in caves, the few of us who are left.
GARKO
http://fightbackforfreedom.com
July 24th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
The changing of the guard, come November, will change nothing. US foreign policy has a logic which transcends who sleeps in the White House…
Yep, a changing of the guard. I used to have to witness these events in the military whenever we got a new commander or first sergeant (luckily my unit didn’t have and wasn’t keen on captains so we didn’t have to endure these nearly as often as other units) and listen to their stupid speeches knowing they thought it was meant to boost morale (which is never does) while standing at ease, until FINALLY we’d hear “platoon attention!” followed by “fall out!”. It’s all a show.
July 24th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
Obama (or Clinton) can do what Bush and the visible Neo-Cons never could- get enough support from the West Europe bloc, both people and political leaders. See all the bulls**t selling the zionist Obama as the next JFK during his european tour?
Obama is designed to be a puppet that appears INCLUSIVE to allies that vomited when Bush stated “you’re either with us or you are with the ‘terrorists’”.
The Neo-con age was used to re-ignite the idea of using US force to exterminate nations. The “if you’ve got it, use it” policy. Now it’s time to slap a fig leaf over US acts of genocide, at least long enough to get the Global War started.
First comes the new age of Europe. The democrat team demanding that the EU creates its first standing army from the timely re-cycling of NATO. How quickly can this be done? Well, make Iran a ‘new’ shiny problem next year, stir up a lot of ‘new’ shiny reactions in the mainsteam media (reactions that are of a ‘completely different’ nature to those held by those previous ‘nasty racist’ republicans, of course), and suggest ‘new’ shiny solutions in the form of a unified military response from ALL the nations of the West!
Funny thing is, some of you here won’t like my words, cos they suggest that nothing seriously bad can now happen for maybe one year+, but this is the form of our victory. Delay IS victory, and the Iran plan (in all of its changing forms) has been pushed back again, and again, and again.
A McCain election win would be a nightmare for the bad guys, since every good person in the USA would fight to the max against the war plans attempted by another republican president. Europe would reject the anti-charismatic slug McCain far more than Bush (you americans cannot comprehend how we perceive your politicians over here).
However, the best outcome is an impossibility, since unlike Bush, McCain has been selected to ensure republican electoral failure 100%.
We win the battle (forcing the bad guys to have to wait for a democratic president has delayed their original plans by years). We lose the war (a democratic president will not fail to ‘rally’ the West for military invasion of Iran). Or, as I boringly remind you, Thatcher (republican sorta) did a lot, but nothing at all in comparison to Blair (democrat sorta). Only a leader from the left (which Hitler was) can create the most effective police states. Only a leader from the left can successfully ignite a Global War.
July 24th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
Dude what are you all complaining about, the nwo has already been established.. You just haven’t got the memo yet.
July 25th, 2008 at 2:54 am
Obama will be a disaster for 911 Truth, and a colossal disappointment for all Americans who want a thorough clean-out of the corruption in US governance. There will be no new Inquiry into 911 or any other matter under Barack Hussein Obama. He will be President Bland, a gossamer-light puppet leaving no foot prints.
Besides he reminds me of Alfred E Neuman from “Mad” comics.
McCain will also be a disaster, but one we can expect.
Ralph Nader may be the only candidate worth voting for.
July 25th, 2008 at 4:22 am
With information so easily avaible via the Internet, anyone stupid enough to vote for either McCain *or* Obama DESERVES to live in tyranny.
If you don’t vote 3rd party or independent this November, you have no right to complain.
July 25th, 2008 at 7:49 am
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1V5iCUBEUx4
We must unite or the dog will bite-
July 25th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Politics is politics….the nwo has been established well before Obama, McCain, Clinton, Kennedy any of these front men were around. 1776 people and even before then Columbus was funded by members of a round table elite society that has become what we know now as a blood line that runs through the global elite (David Icke “And the Truth Shall Set You Free”). Of corse the black dude takes the fall, Bush ran this country into the ground just enough to ruin the hope of the people and then comes a nice face to look at while “they” open the borders for the North American Union. Just like the appointment of a pope its an “evil” pope then a “good” pope. Theres a “good” president then there is an “evil” president. All are working for the same agenda. “Life is a crap sandwich the more dough you got the less crap you gotta eat.” And THIRD PARTY voting? c’mon….really is voting really the answer? I don’t think so. We have a choice to either continue to spew negative energy into the one world, one chip, one media, one world police and let it manifest before our eyes. Or spread love and alternatives. Postive love is the only way and answer out of this mess and it’s not one mans problem it’s the collective conscious of man kind. Love all of you!
July 25th, 2008 at 9:52 am
Nader would be fine and acceptable, but Sen Ron Paul is still the best bet out there and maybe our last chance. In light of the accelerated pace of things in general, there is not a whole lot of time and already there is not a whole lot of freedom. There is abundant information on the internet, but u have to sort thru the bullshit, and unfortunately most people still just get their news fix from one or another of the american pravda sources. But judging from the enormous grassroots internet money raising success of the Ron Paul campaign, maybe more people are paying attention than we might be ready or inclined to believe. Hope so anyway…….