Comments on: Zinn: 9/11 Truth Is For “Fanatics”, Has “No Practical Political Significance”

By: sears.parts

sears.parts — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:04:30 +0000

Thank you for sharing.

By: Randy

Randy — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:58:38 +0000

danny boy Says:
Bush administration has committed enough crimes to be investigated and prosecuted, without bringing up 911.
_______________________________________________________________________________

The world is full of them.
That is exactly why we have lost our Country.

By: Randy

Randy — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:54:02 +0000

Howard Zinn is an idiot!
What I wouldn’t give for a few hours with this ( I REALLY STRESS THIS ) !! IDIOT !!
I am so pissed off I’m shaking.
I am afraid I would have to pop him right in the nose.

By: danny boy

danny boy — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:08:46 +0000

I think he is correct. As much as I understand and agree with the 911 movement’s position of what happened on 911. I agree with his perspective that the Bush administration has committed enough crimes to be investigated and prosecuted, without bringing up 911. So that in an investigation of the Bush administration minus 911, would lay groundwork that would allow the mainstream public to see how possible it is for “the bush admin” to pull off with a clear motivation an event such as 911.
You see, you almost have to drop the very touchy subject to get to the goal. Prove the guilt and fraud of the people with clear and obvious crimes. Then once the vale has been lifted will the people see game for what it is.

“Choose your battles”

By: michael

michael — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:01:03 +0000

this guy EZ says there were no planes and watch sept clues.thats the biggest crock of crap out there.i worked at 33 maiden lane and watched the south tower get hit.HOW DARE YOU SAY NO PLANES HIT THE TROWERS!

By: EZ

EZ — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:33:34 +0000

Blah blah blan Steve Watson — you talk of exposing the truth of 911 and being righteous and virtuous in the face of corruption, yet you continue to cover up the truth, the REAL truth about 911 when you continue to ridicule those who KNOW there were no planes on 911; only fabricated images of planes doing things are literally physically impossible. We know you’re a liar and anyone with an Internet connection can discover there were no planes on 911. And millions already have.

Watch the latest edition of ‘September Clues’ and use discretion when reading Watson’s world.

http://www.google.com/search?h.....mber+clues

By: fernando arboleda

fernando arboleda — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:41:02 +0000

This is a classic example of people taking someone’s words out of context…..if you listen to his painful explanations, he simply says that the Bush regime is guilty of many things and that people overextend their focus on only the nine eleven question….while there are many things to look at….he is not saying that the 9/11 question is unimportant, but that the lies are difficult to untangle, so lets look at other things as well…..i do not see him as an opponent of the truth, but as a pragmatic patriot with brilliant ideas, but some people,like him, write books much better than they speak, so do not confuse a lack of charisma with a brilliant mind.

By: josh

josh — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:51:06 +0000

OK then what do we go after instead. You can’t now because oh shit everything has been outlawed because of 911. If the public wake up to 911 then they may not take everything else lying down. Does Zinn think we should move on from the crimes of the Fed as well. And what about the next false flag operation, at what point do we stop caring about that, or should we just harp on about Trotsky or Marx or the struggle of the Anarchists during the civil war. I think we have to drop the Left Right thing. Its that that is the distraction now. All these labels divide us. I personally think that if they can get away with 911 then we might as well bend over and let them get on with it. George Monbiot is another one caught up in all that red tape. Who is funding these guys anyway.?

By: bottoms up

bottoms up — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:30:51 +0000

Its quite easy to see who was behind it. Read your bible, Read the quran and compare/contrast prophecy, read isolated cultures prophecy, then…go to you tube, educate yourself on some masonic coincidences that are pointed out in these videos..the four horseman are all different colors..masons are all around the world, and are linked to occultism and politics..go figure. Its not much of a question where at the least the events of today have been hatched. Not all masons are bad, but im sure they unquestioningly go along alot with the higher degrees. Just because they buried the surface evidence, doesnt mean that coincidence doesnt speak volumes. You will eventually find that the magick mushroom is a recurring hidden theme in logos and symbols of the world, this relates to masonry and rituals, yet we the average morons can get in trouble for using or having these..yet masons influence again..politics and laws. Even though they “say” they dont. i just see murder and hypocrisy with the worlds power structures, and the smirking mockery by these childish fools is sickening.

http://www.thebravenewworldorder.blogspot.com

“color world of different colors, no chance, to rectify, nightmare running races skywards, spoiled tower, blackwater tea.” SKINNY PUPPY lyrics before 9-11.. is this band visionary?

By: toque

toque — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:07:29 +0000

anyone who calls chomsky an “intellectual coward” is a total clown.

chomsky created all the formative work that allows pions like watson to do what they do…

what chomsky and numerous academics are saying is, “don’t worry about a huge distracting event that we’re never going to get to the bottom of.” there’s a million other obvious things in gov’t and policy that don’t have the drama and emotional baggage attached that you could be going after. harping on 9/11 only is like only using your TV to tune into OJ trials…

there’s plenty of other easy evidence that people can approach level-headed without conjecture that proves many of the “truth” acitivists points much easier. if watson actually listened to what zinn instead of just getting bent out of shape at the notion that “9/11 isn’t important” he’d realize that zinn’s perspective is a bigger, broader and more attainable “truth” goal than 9/11 will ever be.

he compared 9/11 to kennedy because they’re both massive trails that a government wants you to get distracted with because of it’s inherent narrative “wow” factor.

most of the same points people are trying to tie together through 9/11 can be brought together in much more susinct ways with less conjecture if you acutally avoid discussing 9/11.