official version anymore. It is so full of holes that it simply "need not be discussed any longer" or you run the oh-so-awful risk of being labeled an "anti-American marxist spewing communist propaganda".

However, on the few forums that still do allow uncensored free-speech - in hopes that the best memes make it to the top of the pack, there is still a group that refuses to acknowledge some of the very relevant facts, such as
the meetings (before, after and during 9.11) between Senator Bob Graham (D), Representative Porter Goss (R) and Senator John Kyl (R) with ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed, who was, as confirmed by the FBI responsible for wiring 100,000 dollars to Mohamed Atta, (the alleged head terrorist pilot, who incidentally worked for CDS International, an elite US - German government exchange program).

These are the people who refuse to believe that Arabs or anyone of Arabic origin had anything to do with 9.11, and the entire operation was masterminded and executed by Israeli operatives working to perpetuate Israeli foreign policy. The problem with this "conspiracy theory" is that is it just like the official version; "a theory". There is not a shred of evidence to back this claim up.

I am very well aware that the largest spy ring ever uncovered on US soil, as documented by Fox News' Carl Cameron [
video], happened on 9.11 and led to the deportation of an undisclosed, although rather large number of Israeli citizens with connection to communications firms with "back doors" to virtually all Federal wiretapping equipment.

That being said, it was well known that
Mossad and the CIA were trailing the hijackers before the event. An FBI informant lived with the hijackers, some of which lived in a motel right outside the gates of the NSA.

It is also well known as documented by Daniel Hopsicker of
MadCowMorningNews that some of the Venice flight schools had been used for CIA ops and has always had scandalous activity going on, according to statements as such: "Venice was even targeted by the Soviet Union in the event of nuclear war, because of the military nature of certain activities taking place at the Airport."

"It's not unusual to see a military Blackhawk helicopter touch down at the Venice Airport in the middle of the night," stated the official, who requested anonymity, "and then take off again thirty seconds later, after dropping off its cargo or passengers."

"Or you look up and all of a sudden there's 5000 soldiers from the 101st Airborne landing and taking off. Strange things have been going on out there for a long time."

The rabbit hole gets even deeper when you consider
Stanley Hilton's lawsuit representing 400 family members suing Bush and others in the federal government for "causing, aiding and abetting 9/11".

Hilton, Bob Dole's former senior advisor and Wolfowitz schoolmate, claims to be in possession of 9.11 witness deposition, one of which from an ex-wife of one of the hijackers who claimed to have met Atta, that insists they were "operating in a series of cells that were aided and abetted by the US government".

Excerpted from
interview (03/11/03) : "But one of the points that she stressed is they are really not Muslims. They are more interested in Playboy than in the Koran. I mean these people drink. They are very secular. They are not the fanatical Muslim zealots that the Bush criminals would lead us to believe is what’s operating here. What they are is they receive regular payments from the U.S. Government. They have been recruited by the CIA, FBI, counter-intelligence, and so-forth and paid money and allowed to exchange information with U.S. government agents about various activities going on.... "

Michel Chossudovsky of the Centre for Research on Globalisation, has also come to
similar conclusions:

"Of course they knew! The foreknowledge issue is a red herring. The "Islamic Brigades" are a creation of the CIA. In standard CIA jargon, Al Qaeda is categorized as an "intelligence asset". Support to terrorist organizations is an integral part of U.S. foreign policy. Al Qaeda continues to this date (2002) to participate in CIA covert operations in different parts of the World. These "CIA-Osama links" do not belong to a bygone era, as suggested by the mainstream media."

"The U.S. Congress has documented in detail, the links of Al Qaeda to agencies of the U.S. government during the civil war in
Bosnia-Herzegovina, as well as in Kosovo. More recently in Macedonia, barely a few months before September 11, U.S. military advisers were mingling with Mujahideen mercenaries financed by Al Qaeda. Both groups were fighting under the auspices of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), within the same terrorist paramilitary formation."

"The CIA keeps track of its "intelligence assets". Amply documented, Osama bin Laden's whereabouts were
always known. Al Qaeda is infiltrated by the CIA. In other words, there were no "intelligence failures"! In the nature of a well-led intelligence operation, the "intelligence asset" operates (wittingly or unwittingly) with some degree of autonomy, in relation to its U.S. government sponsors, but ultimately it acts consistently, in the interests of Uncle Sam."

"While individual FBI agents are often unaware of the CIA's role, the relationship between the CIA and Al Qaeda is known at the top levels of the FBI. Members of the Bush Administration and the U.S. Congress are fully cognizant of these links."

"The foreknowledge issue focusing on "FBI lapses" is an obvious smokescreen. While the whistleblowers serve to underscore the weaknesses of the FBI, the role of successive U.S. administrations (since the presidency of
Jimmy Carter) in support of the "Islamic Militant Base"[video], is simply not mentioned."

LibertyThink researcher BlackJade has
dug even deeper into some of the goals of the "war on terror":

"The CIA's intent was never to destroy their Al Qaeda offspring or even to "badly disrupt" the Bin Laden network. The CIA wants to grab and silence those with "loose lips," and make sure that they never get on the witness stand, such as in the
Moussaoui case and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed." (not to mention the ill fate of both John O'Neill and Michael Riconosciuto.)

"HUJI and HUM were creations of the CIA, which have served the CIA well for the last two decades. The
Chechen connections follow this same pattern."

So where do the illusive Zionist operatives fit into the picture? They don't. That's exactly the point. Those who prefer that these facts never make it into the spotlight are no longer the Chinese-made American flag waving types.

I've been told that all of the above information is "Zionist disinfo" planted throughout the datasphere to take the attention off of the true culprits.

I am open to many possibilities, but I find it simply implausible that in addition to masterminding and executing the attacks, these "Zionists" are planting stories and using "clever disinfo" to fabricate the fact that at least 5 hijackers were trained at secure
US military facilities.

If immediately after the attacks, the FBI went into 'recovery and damage control mode', why I ask, did they try to implicate the US government before again going into 'recovery and damage control mode' to saying that there were stolen identities?

Do we have any names for these illusive "Zionists" that executed and masterminded this attack? I'm sure they have names as I'm sure they have faces. I'm sure all the money trails could be exposed. Are they really that good at covering their tracks, or is there simply a lack of research?

It just doesn't add up. The assumption that Mossad, or some similar operatives are trying to frame the CIA for 9-11, and the US military for the anthrax attacks, and managed to go behind the CIA's back to "piggy-backed" the attacks on top of the two drills taking place that morning, one of them being a
CIA drill, the other a semi-annual NORAD drill, just doesn't hold water in my book.

This is the information campaign that is the most damaging to the disclosure of the truth of the events of that dark Tuesday morning in September.
Enter recipient's e-mail:

Visit Wade's fine website at Wade can be reached at:
Wade Inganamort

Previous Columns

• 9.11, the Zionist Angle, and the Distortion of the Truth


9/11, the Zionist Angle, and the Distortion of the Truth

By Wade Inganamort

In many circles of internet forae, the official version of 9-11 has been deeply questioned. As I wrote back in January in,
Why the media's conspiracy theory is better than yours, there are numerous problematic facts, as reported by the mainstream media, that do not synch with the official version of the events that unfolded that day.

On most internet forums, there is little or no defense made for the