Dr. Richard Swier
Red County 
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Recently several major stories have appeared in the non-main stream media. After reading them I came to the conclusion that President Obama is filling his administration with pro-abortion proponents not to protect a “woman’s right to choose” but rather to practice a modern form of eugenics.
Eugenics  is “the study of, or belief in, the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic  defects or undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics).”
The seminal statement (no pun intended) on eugenics came from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg who said she was under the impression that legalizing abortion with the 1973 Roe. v. Wade case would eliminate undesirable members of the populace or, as she put it, “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
This concept of reducing the numbers of “populations we don’t want have too many of” is exactly what Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, believed. According to Margaret Sanger in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2), “The purpose in promoting birth control was “to create a race of thoroughbreds.”
So does President Obama believe we need to “create a race of thoroughbreds”?
Let us look at just one of his key appointments, John P. Holdren .
John P. Holdren  is Assistant to President Barack Obama for Science and Technology, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy , and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST ). So what does Dr. Holdren believe about population control?
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
- Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
- The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
- Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
- People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables) “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. No one in their right mind would say such things. Wrong!
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Remember then candidate Obama’s statement about not having his “daughters punished with a baby”. I believe President Obama has the same view of Roe v. Wade as Justice Ginsberg and his appointments, policies and actions prove so. While President Obama says he wants to reduce abortions, does that mean in certain populations only and not others? For that is what his Director of Science believes.
Also, remember Margaret Sanger said in Pivot of Civilization  that blacks, indigents and immigrants were, “…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ‘spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”
If Margaret Sanger had her way Barack Obama would never have been born. It is interesting that it is he who is pushing her radical eugenic approach to population control via John Holdren, his new science director.
I was asked why environmentalists, such as Director Holdren, believe the planet is more important than we humans who have dominion over the earth. My response was because environmentalists truly believe that humans are an infestation upon the earth and must be controlled so as not to destroy its beauty and perfection.
You are and I am the enemy, much like “the Bug” in the movie Men in Black II. We must be eugenically controlled, culled and made into the image of the perfect people by the likes of Barack Obama, John Holdren, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Margaret Sanger.