Guardian Unlimited
Go to:  
Guardian Unlimited PoliticsSpecial Reports
Home Ask Aristotle Whitehall Parliament Polls Backbencher MPís surgery
Talk Special reports Thinktanks Beyond Westminster Links Comment This week

Politics and Iraq

Ask Aristotle Politics database
Find out about your MP
Enter postcode or place:
Enter person:
How to use Aristotle
Archive search
Advanced search

In this section
Polly Toynbee: Did Blair lie to us?

Get-out for Blair over intelligence inquiry

MI6 led protest against war dossier

Blair warned of Iran-backed Shia powers

Dress-down Blair just one of the blokes

Leader: Inquiry on Iraq

Ministers 'distorted' UN weapons report

What they said

'I simply don't believe the whole thing was a lie'

Middle East more secure, PM tells troops

Special report: politics and Iraq

10.30am update

Official explodes key WMD claim

Read the No 10 dossier in question

Tom Happold and agencies
Thursday May 29, 2003

Downing Street doctored a dossier on Iraq's weapons programme to make it "sexier", according to a senior British official, who claims intelligence services were unhappy with the assertion that Saddam's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were ready for use within 45 minutes.

Despite a No 10 denial that "not one word of the dossier was not entirely the work of the intelligence agencies," the revelations are likely to cloud Tony Blair's visit to Iraq today. Critics of the war are expected to claim that the document shows it was one of conquest, not pre-emptive self-defence or liberation.

It is understood that the parliamentary intelligence and security committee is set to launch an enquiry into the claims made by the government about Iraq. And the former foreign secretary, Robin Cook, who resigned over his opposition to the war, last night called for a more independent select committee to investigate the matter.

The unnamed official told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Most people in intelligence weren't happy with the dossier because it didn't reflect the considered view they were putting forward."

Describing how it was "transformed" in the week before it was published to make it "sexier", he added: "The classic example was the statement that weapons of mass destruction were ready for use within 45 minutes.

"That information was not in the original draft. It was included in the dossier against our wishes because it wasn't reliable. Most things in the dossier were double-source but that was single-source and we believe that the source was wrong."

The unnamed official was, however, keen to state that he believed Iraq did have WMD. "I believe it is about 30% likely that there was a chemical weapons programme about six months before the war and considerably more likely that there was a biological weapons programme," he said.

The 50-page document drew on intelligence material from MI6, MI5 and GCHQ and outlined Iraq's attempts to acquire nuclear weapons and to develop long-range ballistic missiles capable of hitting Israel or British bases in Cyprus. It claimed that Saddam Hussien did not regard his WMD as "weapons of last resort" but was ready use them against his enemies and own people.

The defence minister, Adam Ingram, today denied that Downing Street had ordered the doctoring of the dossier. "There was no pressure from No 10," he told the Today programme. "That allegation is not true."

But he did admit that the claim that WMD could be used within 45 minutes was based on a single source. "It wasn't corroborated. I think that has already been conceded."

Mr Ingram also refuted suggestions that the war had been prosecuted on the basis of fanciful and unsubstantiated allegations.

"The war was fought on the basis of all of the allegations, much of which was substantiated, not just by a security document produced by our security services, not concocted by No 10 or under pressure from No 10 to produce it in a particular way, but their best knowledge and their best assessment of what they could declare into the public domain, based upon the knowledge of what was out there."

"The whole world knew what Saddam Hussein was up to in terms of weapons of mass destruction. That's why we prosecuted that war. That's why we were right," he added.

And Mr Ingram echoed Mr Blair's claims yesterday about the doubtless "existence of weapons of mass destruction", saying that "extensive searching" was under way to find the weapons, while a wide range of Iraqis with knowledge of the programmes were being interrogated.

"The jigsaw is now beginning to come into place," he said.

The Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, Menzies Campbell, said today's claims "corroborated" rumours that the intelligence services were "generally unhappy" with the government's use of their information.

"What I think it demonstrates is that if you start to turn the intelligence into a means by which to achieve your political objective then of course it becomes propaganda and is no longer as reliable," he told Today.

Today's allegations follow US defence secretary Donald Rumfeld's comments yesterday that Saddam Hussien may have destroyed his weapons before the start of war and that . They also follow the revelation that part of the government's February document on Iraq's intelligence network was cut and pasted from a PhD student's dissertation.

 Political Alerts
Get daily headlines straight to your mobile

 Sign up for the Backbencher
Our free weekly insider's guide to Westminster

 What do you think?

 Special reports
Politics and the war
Iraq and the media
Foreign affairs

04.10.2002: War with Iraq

 Interactive guides
Blair's road to war

18.03.2003: Tony Blair's speech to the Commons

 Full texts
18.03.2003: Emergency Commons motion on Iraq
Government dossier on Iraqi arms
Government dossier on human rights

19.03.2003: MPs who voted against Blair in March
27.02.2003: MPs who voted against war in February

 Useful links
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Iraq sanctions - UN security council

Printable version | Send it to a friend | Save story


Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003